Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39609330›Full record

ReviewEnvironmental science and pollution research international2024

Valorization of Manihot esculenta peel from environmental pollutant to sustainable engineering solutions for a cleaner future.

Festus Ben

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Environmental science and pollution research international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Festus BenCentre for Nanoengineering and Advanced Materials, Department of Metallurgy, University of Johannesburg, Johannesburg, South Africa. festusb@uj.ac.za.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9048-9422

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As efforts intensify to address the environmental impact of agricultural waste, the valorization of Manihot esculenta peel (MEP) for sustainable engineering applications presents a unique opportunity to repurpose this class of agricultural waste to achieve environmental sustainability development goals while promoting socio-economic development of this pollutant. The inherent properties of MEP, such as its richness in carbohydrates and cellulose, make it a useful raw material for producing biofuels, bioethanols, biocomposites, and other sustainable engineering materials. Its resilience to adverse environmental conditions also makes MEP well-suited for cultivation in diverse agroecological settings, further enhancing its appeal as a sustainable resource. While existing review articles provide valuable insights into Manihot esculenta peel utilization across various industries, they often overlook the comprehensive valorization of Manihot esculenta for sustainable engineering applications, creating a notable knowledge gap. Through a systematic examination of innovative approaches documented in the literature, this research seeks to bridge this gap by elucidating strategies for repurposing cassava waste into valuable engineering materials to mitigate environmental pollution and promote sustainable resource utilization. By synthesizing existing research and identifying key research gaps, this study advances the understanding of Manihot esculenta peel's potential as a sustainable material and facilitates the transition toward greener engineering practices.

Indexed as

ManihotAgricultureEnvironmental PollutantsEnvironmental PollutantsAgro-waste managementCleaner productionEnvironmental pollutionEnvironmental remediationManihot esculentaSustainable engineering materialValorization

Identifiers

PMID39609330
PMCPMC11659381

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.