ArticleScientific reports2024
Abnormal topological structure of structural covariance networks based on fractal dimension in noise induced hearing loss.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Disrupted Cross-Scale Network Associated With Cognitive-Emotional Disorders in Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss.CNS neuroscience & therapeutics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The topological attributes of structural covariance networks (SCNs) based on fractal dimension (FD) and changes in brain network connectivity were investigated using graph theory and network-based statistics (NBS) in patients with noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL). High-resolution 3D T1 images of 40 patients with NIHL and 38 healthy controls (HCs) were analyzed. FD-based Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated and converted to Fisher's Z to construct the SCNs. Topological attributes and network hubs were calculated using the graph theory. Topological measures between groups were compared using nonparametric permutation tests. Abnormal connection networks were identified using NBS analysis. The NIHL group showed a significantly increased normalized clustering coefficient, normalized characteristic path length, and decreased nodal efficiency of the right medial orbitofrontal gyrus. Additionally, the network hubs based on betweenness centrality and degree centrality were both the right transverse temporal gyrus and left parahippocampal gyrus in the NIHL group. The NBS analysis revealed two subnetworks with abnormal connections. The subnetwork with enhanced connections was mainly distributed in the default mode, frontoparietal, dorsal attention, and somatomotor networks, whereas the subnetwork with reduced connections was mainly distributed in the limbic, visual, default mode, and auditory networks. These findings demonstrate the abnormal topological structure of FD-based SCNs in patients with NIHL, which may contribute to understand the complex mechanisms of brain damage at the network level, providing a new theoretical basis for neuropathological mechanisms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.