ReviewCureus2024
Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome and the Efficacy of Platelet-Rich Plasma Injections: A Systematic Review.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Greater trochanteric pain syndrome (GTPS) is one of the most prevalent causes of lateral hip pain. The incidence rate is as high as 1.8 patients per 1000 annually, with females predominantly affected. We compared and analysed the effectiveness of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections in treating GTPS. Literature search was carried out on PubMed, Embase and Cochrane by two independent reviewers using the terms: 'Greater Trochanteric Pain syndrome' and 'Platelet-rich plasma'. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed, and the Cochrane risk of bias tool and Methodological Index for Non-Randomized Studies (MINORS) tool were used to assess bias. Nine studies were shortlisted and reviewed for patient sample size, diagnostic modalities, the presence of tendinopathy or bursitis, the number of PRP injections administered, and the length of symptom relief achieved. We analysed nine studies between 2013 to 2024 comprising of a total of 508 patients who received treatment with PRP injections for lateral hip pain. There was an improvement and sustained relief in symptoms in eight studies, while one reported no change. Many studies indicated PRP injections to be more effective than corticosteroid injections (CSI) in treating GTPS. PRP appears to be an effective injectable treatment option for GTPS, which does not respond to conservative therapy. However, due to the limitations of the current literature, there is a need for more large-scale, high-quality randomized clinical trials to assess further the effectiveness of PRP for treating GTPS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.