SynthesisFrontiers in medicine2024
Bibliometric and visual analysis of radiomics for evaluating lymph node status in oncology.
Synthesis in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence in thyroid ultrasound: clinical applications and perspectives.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Review
- AI in Prostate Cancer Screening & Diagnosis: A Registry-Based Study of ClinicalTrials.gov Trials.Inquiry : a journal of medical care organization, provision and financingArticle
- MRI Radiomics-Based Prediction of Occult Sentinel Lymph Node Metastasis and D2-40 Expression in Breast Cancer.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
- Bibliometric and LDA analysis of acute rejection in liver transplantation: Emerging trends, immunotherapy challenges, and the role of artificial intelligence.Cell transplantationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Radiomics, which involves the conversion of digital images into high-dimensional data, has been used in oncological studies since 2012. We analyzed the publications that had been conducted on this subject using bibliometric and visual methods to expound the hotpots and future trends regarding radiomics in evaluating lymph node status in oncology. Methods: Documents published between 2012 and 2023, updated to August 1, 2024, were searched using the Scopus database. VOSviewer, R Package, and Microsoft Excel were used for visualization. Results: A total of 898 original articles and reviews written in English and be related to radiomics for evaluating lymph node status in oncology, published between 2015 and 2023, were retrieved. A significant increase in the number of publications was observed, with an annual growth rate of 100.77%. The publications predominantly originated from three countries, with China leading in the number of publications and citations. Fudan University was the most contributing affiliation, followed by Sun Yat-sen University and Southern Medical University, all of which were from China. Tian J. from the Chinese Academy of Sciences contributed the most within 5885 authors. In addition, Conclusion: The present bibliometric and visual analysis described an approximately continuous trend of increasing publications related to radiomics in evaluating lymph node status in oncology and revealed that it could serve as an efficient tool for personalized diagnosis and treatment guidance in clinical patients, and combined artificial intelligence should be further considered in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.