ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024
Identification of key programmed cell death genes for predicting prognosis and treatment sensitivity in colorectal cancer.
Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multi-Modal Analysis of Programmed Cell Death Identifies Biomarkers and Informs Prognosis in Osteosarcoma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- PANoptosis as a Two-Edged Sword in Colorectal Cancer: A Pathogenic Mechanism and Therapeutic Opportunity.Cells · 2025Review
- Prognostic risk modeling of endometrial cancer using programmed cell death-related genes: a comprehensive machine learning approach.Discover oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) ranks third in global incidence and second in mortality. However, a comprehensive predictive model for CRC prognosis, immunotherapy response, and drug sensitivity is still lacking. Various types of programmed cell death (PCD) are crucial for cancer occurrence, progression, and treatment, indicating their potential as valuable predictors. Fourteen PCD genes were collected and subjected to dimensionality reduction using regression methods to identify key hub genes. Predictive models were constructed and validated based on bulk transcriptomes and single-cell transcriptomes. Furthermore, the tumor microenvironment, immunotherapy response, and drug sensitivity profiles among patients with CRC were explored and stratified by risk. A risk score incorporating the PCD genes FABP4, AQP8, and NAT1 was developed and validated across four independent datasets. Patients with CRC who had a high-risk score exhibited a poorer prognosis. Unsupervised clustering algorithms were used to identify two molecular subtypes of CRC with distinct features. The risk score was combined with the clinical features to create a nomogram model with superior predictive performance. Additionally, patients with high-risk scores exhibited decreased immune cell infiltration, higher stromal scores, and reduced responsiveness to immunotherapy and first-line clinical drugs compared with low-risk patients. Furthermore, the top ten non-clinical first-line drugs for treating CRC were selected based on their predicted IC50 values. Our results indicate the efficacy of the model and its potential value in predicting prognosis, response to immunotherapy, and sensitivity to different drugs in patients with CRC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.