ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2024
Preclinical screening for cardiovascular disease with high-sensitivity cardiac troponins: ready, set, go?
Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Application of glutamine metabolism-related gene signatures in the non-invasive diagnosis of coronary artery disease: integrating bulk and single-cell transcriptomics.Journal of bioenergetics and biomembranes · 2026Article
- Association of short-term glycemic variability with subclinical myocardial injury in hospitalized patients with type 2 diabetes: a retrospective cross-sectional study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Biomarkers in Heart Failure: A Review and a Wish.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiovascular disease (CVD), including atherosclerosis, valvular etiologies, or myocardial disorders, is typically asymptomatic for several years, representing an occult phase of illness. Readily available preventive treatments to reduce cholesterol and blood pressure, among other risk factors, have the potential to reduce and delay incident myocardial infarction (MI), heart failure, and cardiovascular (CV) deaths. Measurement of circulating levels of cardiac troponin T (cTnT) and troponin I (cTnI) released from cardiomyocytes, as a result of injury, has been the biochemical standard for the diagnosis of MI for more than 20 years. The recent adoption of high-sensitivity (hs) assays, which are capable of measuring cTnT and I levels in more than 50% of the general population, has revealed a clear association between progressively higher biomarker levels and future CV events. In cross-sectional imaging studies, cTn levels measured by hs assays have also demonstrated correlations between elevated biomarker levels and occult CVD such as coronary artery disease and myocardial fibrosis. In this review, we provide evidence to consider measuring hs-cTnT and hs-cTnI to screen for patient CV risk and provide an example of a scenario in which such screening may improve outcomes through decision support for aggressive management of blood pressure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.