Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39610995›Full record

ArticleBMJ open sport & exercise medicine2024

Cardiovascular effects of exercise training in pregnant people with a high body mass index: secondary results from a randomised controlled trial (ETIP).

Trine Moholdt, Kirsti Krohn Garnæs, Idunn Pernille Vik, Siv Mørkved, Kjell Åsmund Salvesen, Charlotte Björk Ingul

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open sport & exercise medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01243554 (Exercise Training in Pregnancy. Good for the Mother - Good for the Child?), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01243554 nacompletednot on this map

Exercise Training in Pregnancy. Good for the Mother - Good for the Child?

TypeinterventionalSponsorNorwegian University of Science and TechnologyRan2010 to 2016Enrolled91ConditionsPregnancy, ObesityArmsExercise
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Trine MoholdtDepartment of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-1024-8088
Kirsti Krohn GarnæsDepartment of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-0983-8702
Idunn Pernille VikDepartment of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Siv MørkvedDepartment of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0009-0004-1934-7263
Kjell Åsmund SalvesenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, St Olav's Hospital HF, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-1788-4063
Charlotte Björk IngulDepartment of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-3251-9494

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: We aimed to determine the effectiveness of exercise training during pregnancy on peak oxygen uptake (V̇O Trial design: Parallel-group randomised controlled trial (RCT). Methods: The exercise group in the Exercise Training in Pregnancy (ETIP) RCT was offered 3 weekly supervised exercise sessions comprising 35 min of moderate-intensity treadmill walking followed by 25 min of strength exercises. The intervention started in gestational weeks 12-18 and continued throughout pregnancy. We measured V̇O Results: Of the 91 participants included in ETIP, 87 participants (age: 31.3±4.2 years, BMI: 34.6±4.3 kg/m Conclusion: Offering pregnant individuals with BMI ≥28 kg/m Trial registration number: NCT01243554.

Indexed as

CardiovascularObesityPhysical activityPhysical fitnessPregnancy

Identifiers

PMID39610995
PMCPMC11603832

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.