Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39611111›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in veterinary science2024

Electroencephalography: electrode arrays in dogs.

Stephen Everest, Luis Gaitero, Robert Dony, Alexander Zur Linden, Miguel A Cortez, Fiona M K James

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Stephen EverestDepartment of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College Health Sciences Centre, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.
Luis GaiteroDepartment of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College Health Sciences Centre, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.
Robert DonySchool of Engineering, College of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.
Alexander Zur LindenDepartment of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College Health Sciences Centre, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.
Miguel A CortezDivision of Neurology, Department of Paediatrics, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto; Neurosciences & Mental Health Program, Peter Gilgan Center Research Learning, SickKids Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Fiona M K JamesDepartment of Clinical Studies, Ontario Veterinary College Health Sciences Centre, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electroencephalography (EEG) is the gold standard for confirming epileptic seizures in both human and veterinary patients. Despite idiopathic epilepsy being one of the most common neurological conditions in dogs, our understanding of it in veterinary medicine lags that in human medicine. The relative underuse of EEG in dogs with seizures has potential causes including practical issues, financial concerns, lack of training/equipment, and questions of clinical value. This technological underuse may lead to, or result from, major gaps in our understanding of EEG in veterinary patients. This underutilization of EEG is of significant clinical relevance because the diagnosis of specific epilepsy syndromes in humans guides the treatment, namely pharmacological, dietary, or surgical. These epilepsy syndromes are diagnosed based on several factors, one of which is the characteristic electrical brain activity on EEG. The aim of this narrative literature review was to highlight the study of cortical brain activity to improve our understanding of EEG in veterinary medicine. Specifically, the utility of EEG with focus on the existing proposed electrode arrays and their current supporting evidence. A recent survey study confirmed that a variety of canine EEG protocols are concurrently in use, including diverse electrode arrays. By comparison, in humans there is a standardized 10-20 electrode array, with average localization error of 13-17 mm depending on the number of placed electrodes on the scalp. We offer a review of the factors that would contribute to the ideal canine EEG electrode array highlighting areas for improvement and future validation. This proposed level of understanding will facilitate the identification of cortical seizure foci with a known degree of error, paving the way for non-pharmaceutical interventions like epilepsy surgeries.

Indexed as

dogselectroencephalographyepilepsyseizuresstandardized electrode placement

Identifiers

PMID39611111
PMCPMC11602745

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.