Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39611429›Full record

ReviewAngewandte Chemie (International ed. in English)2025

Fighting Antimicrobial Resistance: Innovative Drugs in Antibacterial Research.

Roderich D Süssmuth, Marcel Kulike-Koczula, Peng Gao, Simone Kosol

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Molecular action of NZ2114, a superior plectasin derivative.npj antimicrobials and resistance · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Negamycin: Nature's Forgotten Antibiotic.ACS infectious diseases · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Frontiers in bioinformatics · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Fighting Antimicrobial Resistance: Innovative Drugs in Antibacterial Research.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Roderich D SüssmuthInstitut für Chemie, Technische Universität Berlin, Strasse des 17. Juni 124, TC2, 10629, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7027-2069
Marcel Kulike-KoczulaInstitut für Chemie, Technische Universität Berlin, Strasse des 17. Juni 124, TC2, 10629, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-8967-6571
Peng GaoInstitut für Chemie, Technische Universität Berlin, Strasse des 17. Juni 124, TC2, 10629, Berlin, Germany.
Simone KosolMedical School Berlin, Department Human Medicine, Rüdesheimer Strasse 50, 14195, Berlin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7913-4818

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 392923329Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 392923329)Elsa-Neumann-Stipendium für Promovierende T70011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the fight against bacterial infections, particularly those caused by multi-resistant pathogens known as "superbugs", the need for new antibacterials is undoubted in scientific communities and is by now also widely perceived by the general population. However, the antibacterial research landscape has changed considerably over the past years. With few exceptions, the majority of big pharma companies has left the field and thus, the decline in R&D on antibacterials severely impacts the drug pipeline. In recent years, antibacterial research has increasingly relied on smaller companies or academic research institutions, which mostly have only limited financial resources, to carry a drug discovery and development process from the beginning and through to the beginning of clinical phases. This review formulates the requirements for an antibacterial in regard of targeted pathogens, resistance mechanisms and drug discovery. Strategies are shown for the discovery of new antibacterial structures originating from natural sources, by chemical synthesis and more recently from artificial intelligence approaches. This is complemented by principles for the computer-aided design of antibacterials and the refinement of a lead structure. The second part of the article comprises a compilation of antibacterial molecules classified according to bacterial target structures, e.g. cell wall synthesis, protein synthesis, as well as more recently emerging target classes, e.g. fatty acid synthesis, proteases and membrane proteins. Aspects of the origin, the antibacterial spectrum, resistance and the current development status of the presented drug molecules are highlighted.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacteriaDrug Resistance, BacterialBacterial InfectionsDrug DiscoveryHumansAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntibacterialsAntimicrobial resistanceDrug DiscoveryInnovative Mode of Action

Identifiers

PMID39611429
PMCPMC11878372

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.