ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2024
Italian cross-cultural validation of the STRONGkids tool for pediatric nutritional evaluation.
Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative evaluation of nutritional risk screening tools in hospitalized children with acute gastroenteritis.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nutritional assessment plays a pivotal role in individual development and represents a fundamental component in the early identification of nutritional challenges and imbalances in pediatric patients. Among the validated instruments in the literature, the STRONGkids tool is the most utilized. This study aimed to undertake the translation and transcultural validation of the STRONGkids tool. The STRONGkids tool underwent initial validation following the six-phase protocol outlined by Sousa and Rojjanasrirat, after which it was translated into Italian. The final Italian version of STRONGkids was then administered to a cohort of hospitalized children. Collected data underwent analysis to assess its psychometric properties. Through the initial five phases, an Italian version of the STRONGkids tool was developed, which is congruent with the original and widely utilized version. The sixth phase exhibited favorable intra-rater reliability (k = 0.92; 95% CI 0.87-0.97) and inter-rater reliability (k = 0.77; 95% CI 0.68-0.86). Conclusion: The validated Italian version of STRONGkids emerges as a crucial instrument for precise nutritional assessment during hospitalization, ensuring convenience and effectiveness for professionals. Our findings advocate for the adoption of STRONGkids as a tool for screening pediatric nutritional risk in Italy. STRONGkids represents a complementary tool alongside anthropometric evaluations for nurses. Recognizing its importance, nurses can enhance early identification and intervention in pediatric patients' nutritional risk as part of routine care, fostering interdisciplinary collaboration for optimal patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39612005What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.