Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39612512›Full record

ArticleHealth promotion international2024

Process evaluation of the digital Health4Life intervention among a sample of disadvantaged adolescents and teachers.

Lyra Egan, Lauren A Gardner, Nicola C Newton, Katrina E Champion

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lyra EganThe Matilda Centre for Research in Mental Health and Substance Use, Level 6, Jane Foss Russell Building, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-0922-4396
Lauren A GardnerThe Matilda Centre for Research in Mental Health and Substance Use, Level 6, Jane Foss Russell Building, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Nicola C NewtonThe Matilda Centre for Research in Mental Health and Substance Use, Level 6, Jane Foss Russell Building, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.
Katrina E ChampionThe Matilda Centre for Research in Mental Health and Substance Use, Level 6, Jane Foss Russell Building, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia.

Funding

Paul Ramsay FoundationUniversity of Sydney Horizon Fellowship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Disadvantaged adolescents, including those from lower socioeconomic status (SES) or geographically remote backgrounds, engage in higher rates of risk behaviours, including poor diet, alcohol and tobacco use. While digital interventions targeting lifestyle risk behaviours show potential, few studies have focused on their implementation and relevance for this population. This study conducted a process evaluation of 'Health4Life', a universal school-based digital program targeting multiple behaviours, among a sample of disadvantaged adolescents. Participants were from six schools classified as low SES (Index of Community Socio-educational Advantage percentile score ≤ 25%), and/or regional using the Australian Statistical Geography Standard. Self-reported student (n = 214) and teacher evaluations (n = 16) assessed Health4Life's acceptability, with qualitative questions capturing areas for improvement. Teacher-reported implementation data (n = 16) measured intervention fidelity and feasibility. Quantitative data were analysed using descriptive statistics and open-ended responses were thematically analysed. Compared to the entire sample, this subset of students evaluated Health4Life less favourably (66% versus 75%), with fewer enjoying the stories (63% versus 75%) and planning to use the skills and information (60% versus 70%). Teacher evaluations were mostly positive and aligned closely with the entire sample. Fidelity data also indicated comparable levels of student engagement (~92% versus ~85%). Key themes for refinement included improving content relevance and technical execution to better resonate with disadvantaged adolescents. While teacher evaluations suggest Health4Life is a valuable program in low SES or regional contexts, students' lower ratings indicate refinements are needed. Identified areas for improvement will guide co-designing the program's adaptation to improve effectiveness and relevance for disadvantaged adolescents. Trial registration: The Health4Life trial is registered with the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ACTRN12619000431123).

Indexed as

Vulnerable PopulationsAdolescentAustraliaFemaleHealth PromotionHumansMaleProgram EvaluationSchool Health ServicesSchool TeachersStudentsadolescent healtheHealthlifestyle behaviourspreventionprocess evaluationsociodemographic disadvantage

Identifiers

PMID39612512
PMCPMC11606168

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.