Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39613110›Full record

ReviewThe Journal of allergy and clinical immunology2025

Indoor bioaerosols and asthma: Overview, implications, and mitigation strategies.

Karen C Dannemiller, Laura A Conrad, Sarah R Haines, Yvonne J Huang, Linsey C Marr, Jeffrey A Siegel, Sumaiya Hassan, Jon C King, Aaron J Prussin, Austin Shamblin and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Journal of allergy and clinical immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Karen C DannemillerCivil, Environmental, and Geodetic Engineering, College of Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio; Environmental Health Sciences, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio; Sustainability Institute, College of Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio. Electronic address: Dannemiller.70@osu.edu.
Laura A ConradDepartment of Pediatrics, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York.
Sarah R HainesDepartment of Civil & Mineral Engineering, Faculty of Applied Science & Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario.
Yvonne J HuangDepartment of Medicine (Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine), University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich; Department of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Mich.
Linsey C MarrCivil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Va.
Jeffrey A SiegelDepartment of Civil & Mineral Engineering, Faculty of Applied Science & Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario.
Sumaiya HassanDepartment of Civil & Mineral Engineering, Faculty of Applied Science & Engineering, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario.
Jon C KingCivil, Environmental, and Geodetic Engineering, College of Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio; Environmental Health Sciences, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio; Environmental Science Graduate Program, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Aaron J PrussinCivil and Environmental Engineering, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Va.
Austin ShamblinEnvironmental Health Sciences, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio; Infectious Diseases Institute Genomic and Microbiology Solutions (IDI-GEMS), The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio.
Matthew S PerzanowskiDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, NY.

Funding

True Metal fac coreP30ES009089 · NIEHS · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Ami R Zota · 1998 to 2026
$44.7M
NIEHS NIH HHS P30 ES009089
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aerosolized particles with a biological origin are called bioaerosols. Bioaerosols from plants, animals, fungi, bacteria, and viruses are an important class of environmental exposures that are clinically relevant to asthma. However, there are important differences in the pathways by which various bioaerosols affect asthma. Additionally, differences in individual susceptibility to different bioaerosols affect exposure reduction and mitigation strategies. Strategies to reduce exposures to potential triggers of asthma are routinely considered as part of standard clinical care and asthma management guidelines. Ventilation standards in buildings may reduce bioaerosol exposure for everyone, but they are not necessarily designed specifically to protect patients with asthma. Direct measurement of a bioaerosol is not generally necessary for practical applications where the relevant source of the bioaerosol has been identified. Different types of bioaerosols can be controlled with similar strategies that prioritize source control (eg, reducing resuspension, integrated pest management, controlling moisture), and these can be supplemented by enhancing air filtration. The goal of this review is to summarize the latest information on bioaerosols, including allergens, fungi, bacteria, and viruses, that have been associated with adverse asthma outcomes and to discuss mitigation options.

Indexed as

Air MicrobiologyAir Pollution, IndoorAsthmaAerosolsAllergensAnimalsEnvironmental ExposureFungiHumansAerosolsAllergensAllergic sensitizationcatdogmoisturemoldparticulate matterpestspetrespiratory illnessventilation

Identifiers

PMID39613110
PMCPMC11875944

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.