ArticleGenome biology and evolution2024
Cis-regulatory Variation in Relation to Sex and Sexual Dimorphism in Drosophila melanogaster.
Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The geometry of dominance shows broad potential for stable polymorphism under antagonistic pleiotropy.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- A Balanced Inversion Polymorphism Exhibits a Dominance Reversal at the Gene Expression Level that Depends on Developmental Context.Molecular biology and evolution · 2025Article
- Expression Divergence in Response to Sex-biased Selection.Molecular biology and evolution · 2025Article
- Sex-Specific Dominance of Gene Expression in Seed Beetles.Molecular biology and evolution · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Much of sexual dimorphism is likely due to sex-biased gene expression, which results from differential regulation of a genome that is largely shared between males and females. Here, we use allele-specific expression to explore cis-regulatory variation in Drosophila melanogaster in relation to sex. We develop a Bayesian framework to infer the transcriptome-wide joint distribution of cis-regulatory effects across the sexes. We also examine patterns of cis-regulatory variation with respect to two other levels of variation in sexual dimorphism: (i) across genes that vary in their degree of sex-biased expression and (ii) among tissues that vary in their degree of dimorphism (e.g. relatively low dimorphism in heads vs. high dimorphism in gonads). We uncover evidence of widespread cis-regulatory variation in all tissues examined, with female-biased genes being especially enriched for this variation. A sizeable proportion of cis-regulatory variation is inferred to have sex-specific effects, with sex-dependent cis effects being much more frequent in gonads than in heads. Finally, we find some genes where 1 allele contributes to more than 50% of a gene's expression in heterozygous males but <50% of its expression in heterozygous females. Such variants could provide a mechanism for sex-specific dominance reversals, a phenomenon important for sexually antagonistic balancing selection. However, tissue differences in allelic imbalance are approximately as frequent as sex differences, perhaps suggesting that sexual conflict may not be particularly unique in shaping patterns of expression variation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.