Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39613799›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Retinal imaging based glaucoma detection using modified pelican optimization based extreme learning machine.

Debendra Muduli, Rani Kumari, Adnan Akhunzada, Korhan Cengiz, Santosh Kumar Sharma, Rakesh Ranjan Kumar, Dinesh Kumar Sah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Debendra MuduliDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, C.V. Raman Global University, Bhubaneswar, 751012, India.
Rani KumariDepartment of Computer Science, Birla Institute of Technology, Ranchi, Jharkhand, 847226, India.
Adnan AkhunzadaCollege of Computing and IT, Department of Data and Cybersecurity, University of Doha for Science and Technology, Doha, Qatar.
Korhan CengizDepartment of Electrical-Electronics Engineering, Istinye University, 34010, Istanbul, Turkey.
Santosh Kumar SharmaDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, C.V. Raman Global University, Bhubaneswar, 751012, India.
Rakesh Ranjan KumarDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, C.V. Raman Global University, Bhubaneswar, 751012, India.
Dinesh Kumar SahDepartment of Computer Science and Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Dhanbad, 826001, India. dinesh.16dr000267@cse.ism.ac.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glaucoma is defined as progressive optic neuropathy that damages the structural appearance of the optic nerve head and is characterized by permanent blindness. For mass fundus image-based glaucoma classification, an improved automated computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) model performing binary classification (glaucoma or healthy), allowing ophthalmologists to detect glaucoma disease correctly in less computational time. We proposed learning technique called fast discrete curvelet transform with wrapping (FDCT-WRP) to create feature set. This method is entitled extracting curve-like features and creating a feature set. The combined feature reduction techniques named as principal component analysis and linear discriminant analysis, have been applied to generate prominent features and decrease the feature vector dimension. Lastly, a newly improved learning algorithm encompasses a modified pelican optimization algorithm (MOD-POA) and an extreme learning machine (ELM) for classification tasks. In this MOD-POA+ELM algorithm, the modified pelican optimization algorithm (MOD-POA) has been utilized to optimize the parameters of ELM's hidden neurons. The effectiveness has been evaluated using two standard datasets called G1020 and ORIGA with the [Formula: see text]-fold stratified cross-validation technique to ensure reliable evaluation. Our employed scheme achieved the best results for both datasets obtaining accuracy of 93.25% (G1020 dataset) and 96.75% (ORIGA dataset), respectively. Furthermore, we have utilized seven Explainable AI methodologies: Vanilla Gradients (VG), Guided Backpropagation (GBP ), Integrated Gradients ( IG), Guided Integrated Gradients (GIG), SmoothGrad, Gradient-weighted Class Activation Mapping (GCAM), and Guided Grad-CAM (GGCAM) for interpretability examination, aiding in the advancement of dependable and credible automation of healthcare detection of glaucoma.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsGlaucomaMachine LearningRetinaDiagnosis, Computer-AssistedHumansPrincipal Component AnalysisELMFDCT-WRPGlaucoma detectionIOPLDAMOD-POA

Identifiers

PMID39613799
PMCPMC11606957

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.