ArticleScientific reports2024
Reduced antimicrobial use in weaned pigs through an intervention program supporting veterinarians' adherence to the clinical practice Streptococcus suis guideline.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Veterinary guidelines have been published in the Netherlands to promote antimicrobial stewardship. An evidence-based intervention program using Implementation Mapping and performance indicators was developed to enhance veterinarians' adherence to the veterinary guideline "Streptococcus suis in weaned pigs". The present study evaluates the effect of this eight-month intervention program in a multicenter, pragmatic, stepped-wedge cluster design trial. Of the 49 veterinarians that participated, 33 provided data from 125 S. suis problem farms. A baseline measurement (M0) before the intervention program, and two measurements during (M1) and partly after (M2) the intervention program were conducted. A significant reduction in farm-level antimicrobial use of 25% in M1 and 49% in M2 was achieved compared to M0. For the performance indicators at veterinarian level, a significant reduction (- 36%) was found for antimicrobial prescription in M2, a significant increase occurred in argumentation for 2nd choice antimicrobials (M2) and the usage of bacteriological examination (M1). Two other performance indicators (ratio of 1st to 2nd or 3rd choice antimicrobials and corticosteroids) did not change significantly. These results show how an evidence-based intervention program to foster adherence to an existing veterinary clinical practice guideline achieved a significant reduction in antimicrobial prescriptions by swine veterinarians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.