Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39614135›Full record

Trial reportBMC anesthesiology2024

The effect of smart glasses combined with ultrasound on radial arterial catheterization: a randomized controlled trial.

Yan Wang, Mingjing Chen, Ting Zou, Yan Weng, Wenjie Mao, Qing Zhong, Haibo Song

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC anesthesiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yan Wang *Department of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, P. R. China.
Mingjing Chen *Department of Epidemiology, College of Public Health & Health Professions and College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Ting ZouDepartment of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, P. R. China.
Yan WengDepartment of Anesthesiology, The People's Hospital of Jianyang City, Chengdu, 641400, Sichuan, P. R. China.
Wenjie MaoDepartment of Anesthesiology, The People's Hospital of Jianyang City, Chengdu, 641400, Sichuan, P. R. China.
Qing ZhongDepartment of Anesthesiology, The People's Hospital of Jianyang City, Chengdu, 641400, Sichuan, P. R. China. 894274168@qq.com.
Haibo SongDepartment of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, 610041, Sichuan, P. R. China. pdasonghaibo@163.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe integration of smart glasses with ultrasound technology offers a novel approach to improve the efficiency of radial arterial catheterization. Few studies have investigated the effectiveness of smart glasses in enhancing procedural outcomes in a clinical setting. This study aims to assess whether smart glasses combined with ultrasound can improve the initial success rate of radial artery catheterization compared to traditional ultrasound-guided methods in adults.

methodsThis single-blinded, randomized controlled trial enrolled patients aged 18-70 with American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status I-III, who required radial artery catheterization as part of their procedure under general anesthesia. Patients were randomized 1:1 into the ultrasound group and the smart glasses group. Radial arterial catheterization was carried out by one of six anesthesiologists before general anesthesia. The primary endpoint was the first puncture success rate. Secondary endpoints included hand-eye coordination (measured by head rotations, probe repositioning and needle redirections), operator's satisfaction.

resultsA total of 222 patients were analyzed, with the smart glasses group demonstrating a higher rate of first puncture success compared to the control group (88.3% [98/111] vs. 72.1% [80/111]; P = 0.002; relative risk [RR], 1.23; 95% CI (1.07, 1.40)). Hand-eye coordination improved significantly in the smart glasses group than the control group, including: fewer number of head rotations (0 [0, 0] vs. 3 [2, 6]; P < 0.001); fewer number of ultrasound probe repositioning (0 [0, 0] vs. 0 [0, 1]; P < 0.001); fewer number of needle redirections (0 [0, 1] vs. 1 [0, 3]; P < 0.001). The proportion of positive satisfaction (81 to 100 points) in the smart glasses group was higher (89.2% [99/111] vs. 69.4% [77/111]; P <  0.001; RR, 1.29; 95% CI (1.12, 1.48)).

conclusionsThe use of smart glasses significantly improved the first puncture success rate, hand-eye coordination ability and operators' satisfaction in radial arterial catheterization.

trial registrationThe study was registered at Chictr.org.cn with the number ChiCTR2400081399 on 29/02/2024.

Indexed as

Catheterization, PeripheralRadial ArterySmart GlassesUltrasonography, InterventionalAdolescentAdultAgedAnesthesia, GeneralFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSingle-Blind MethodYoung AdultCatheterizationClinical trialComplication rateFirst puncture success rateHand-eye coordinationRadial arterialSatisfactionSmart glassesUltrasoundUltrasound-guided interventions

Identifiers

PMID39614135
PMCPMC11605872

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.