SynthesisBMC medical informatics and decision making2024
Which criteria are important in usability evaluation of mHealth applications: an umbrella review.
Synthesis in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Usability and User Experience Assessment of Health Care Conversational Agents Using Validated Subjective Instruments: Systematic Review and Comparative Analysis.JMIR human factors · 2026Pooled it
- Feasibility, Usability, and Preliminary Effectiveness of an mHealth App to Promote Screening Behaviors Among High-Risk Populations for Breast Cancer: Randomized Controlled Pilot Study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2026Trial
- Usability Across 3 mHealth Problem-Solving Training Interventions for Diverse Neurodevelopmental and Neurological Populations: Multicase Usability Evaluation.JMIR human factors · 2026Article
- Design and Usability Evaluation of a Smartphone Application for Postoperative Self-Management in Breast Cancer Patients.Cancer medicine · 2026Article
- Acceptability and Preliminary Evaluation of a Campus-Integrated Digital Platform (Fruto) for University Students' Mental Health Help-Seeking: Sequential Mixed Methods Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- The acceptability, adoption and feasibility of mobile health interventions for diabetes and hypertension care among Ghanaian healthcare workers.PEC innovation · 2026Article
- Perceived Usability as a Factor Associated with Clinical Outcomes in Mobile Health Diabetes Management: A Bayesian Mediation and Equity Analysis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Applying a multi-level usability framework for evaluation of a pregnancy health promotion app.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- A hierarchical framework to evaluate the usability of smartphone health applications.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Step by step: promoting daily walking through a mHealth intervention.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- [Digital treatment of fibromyalgia].Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2025Review
- Usability evaluation of a mobile mental health app for depression and anxiety self-care in Ethiopia.Discover mental health · 2025Article
- User Engagement, Demographics, and Health Status of the My ME-BYO Record, A Personal Health Management Mobile App: Retrospective Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- A systematic review of user-based usability testing practices in self-care mHealth apps.Digital healthReview
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionUsability plays a critical role in the design of mHealth applications. A well-designed app enhances user experience and contributes to better healthcare outcomes. However, it remains unclear which usability criteria are often neglected, leading to issues in the actual use of these applications. This study aimed to identify and categorize the usability issues of mHealth applications, mapping them to Nielsen's usability principles to determine the most critical criteria.
methodsThe PRISMA guidelines were followed to report the results. Different databases (PubMed, Scopus, WoS) were searched for systematic reviews and/or meta-analyses about usability evaluation in mHealth applications. Two reviewers independently applied predefined selection criteria, extracted data, and assessed methodological quality using the AMSTAR tool.
resultsEight studies met the inclusion criteria. The most common method used in studies to evaluate the usability of mHealth applications was the questionnaire. Researchers identified 79 usability issues from the studies. Eleven of the issues were related to the Aesthetic and minimalist design category. The category of Flexibility and efficiency of use was next (n = 10).
conclusionThis study identified the usability issues that individuals face when using mHealth applications. By mapping these issues to evaluation criteria, developers can systematically address and prevent them. Attention to these issues will lead to better design and more effective use of mHealth applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.