ArticlePlant communications2025
Metabolic marker-assisted genomic prediction improves hybrid breeding.
Article in Plant communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Climate change and crop resilience: harnessing metabolomics for predicting stress tolerance.The New phytologist · 2026Review
- Association Between Environmental Chemicals Phthalates and Stroke Among the US Adults: A Cross-Sectional Study.Cardiovascular toxicology · 2026Article
- MeNet: A mixed-effect deep neural network for multi-environment genomic prediction of agronomic traits.Plant communications · 2026Article
- Decoding plant physiology through systems biology: Integrative multi-omics and computational perspectives for next-generation crop design.Plant communications · 2026Review
- Assessment of phenotypic trait plasticity in the oilseed Camelina sativa using integrated early stage abiotic stress and field studies.Plant physiology · 2026Article
- Beyond QTL and GWAS: how deep learning, graph models, and multi-omics are reshaping plant genomic prediction analysis.Frontiers in genetics · 2026Review
- Harnessing Multi-Omics and Predictive Modeling for Climate-Resilient Crop Breeding: From Genomes to Fields.Genes · 2025Review
- Progress in Transcriptomics and Metabolomics in Plant Responses to Abiotic Stresses.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Review
- Machine Learning-Based identification of resistance genes associated with sunflower broomrape.Plant methods · 2025Article
- Cropformer: An interpretable deep learning framework for crop genomic prediction.Plant communications · 2025Article
- Development of a clinical prediction model for intra-abdominal infection in severe acute pancreatitis using logistic regression and nomogram.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Enhancing genomic prediction inFrontiers in bioinformatics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Hybrid breeding is widely acknowledged as the most effective method for increasing crop yield, particularly in maize and rice. However, a major challenge in hybrid breeding is the selection of desirable combinations from the vast pool of potential crosses. Genomic selection (GS) has emerged as a powerful tool to tackle this challenge, but its success in practical breeding depends on prediction accuracy. Several strategies have been explored to enhance prediction accuracy for complex traits, such as the incorporation of functional markers and multi-omics data. Metabolome-wide association studies (MWAS) help to identify metabolites that are closely linked to phenotypes, known as metabolic markers. However, the use of preselected metabolic markers from parental lines to predict hybrid performance has not yet been explored. In this study, we developed a novel approach called metabolic marker-assisted genomic prediction (MM_GP), which incorporates significant metabolites identified from MWAS into GS models to improve the accuracy of genomic hybrid prediction. In maize and rice hybrid populations, MM_GP outperformed genomic prediction (GP) for all traits, regardless of the method used (genomic best linear unbiased prediction or eXtreme gradient boosting). On average, MM_GP demonstrated 4.6% and 13.6% higher predictive abilities than GP for maize and rice, respectively. MM_GP could also match or even surpass the predictive ability of M_GP (integrated genomic-metabolomic prediction) for most traits. In maize, the integration of only six metabolic markers significantly associated with multiple traits resulted in 5.0% and 3.1% higher average predictive ability compared with GP and M_GP, respectively. With advances in high-throughput metabolomics technologies and prediction models, this approach holds great promise for revolutionizing genomic hybrid breeding by enhancing its accuracy and efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.