ArticleJournal of nutrition education and behavior2025
Community-Engaged Development of a Nutrition Curriculum: The Go Healthy Indigenous-Supported Agriculture Study.
Article in Journal of nutrition education and behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- What nourishes us: psychometric validation of culturally grounded measures of indigenous nourishment in a cross-sectional study of two urban native communities.Public health nutrition · 2026Article
- Indigenous perspectives of a culturally tailored dietary intervention: Qualitative findings from the CHEERS study.Health education research · 2025Article
- Association of Veggie Meter-Assessed Skin Carotenoids and Dietary Intake Among Indigenous Families: The Indigenous Supported Agriculture "Go Healthy" Study.Current developments in nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo understand how Osage Nation community members define healthy eating and develop a corresponding nutrition curriculum through community engagement.
designThis project comprised a concurrent embedded mixed methods group concept mapping (GCM) study followed by focus group discussions (FGD) to provide feedback on a nutrition curriculum.
settingOsage Nation, Oklahoma.
participantsIn the GCM study, 54 participants were recruited from a study of an Indigenous-supported agriculture program. GCM study participants and the Go Healthy Advisory Group participated in 2 FGDs. PHENOMENON OF INTEREST: For the first study, concepts related to healthy eating were explored. In the second study, participants provided feedback on curriculum clarity, perceived efficacy, and relevance. ANALYSIS: In the first study, a multidimensional scaling algorithm was used to plot statements, and concept clusters were interpreted in a facilitated meeting with participants. A basic content analysis approach was used in the second study.
resultsFive concept clusters related to healthy eating were identified. These clusters were used to generate an 8-module curriculum deemed clear, potentially efficacious, and relevant among FGD participants. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: Community members contributed to a framework of healthy eating for the Osage community, which was used to develop a nutrition curriculum that will be integrated into an Indigenous-supported agriculture program. Future research should explore long-term sustainability and the broader cultural impacts of nutrition programs on Indigenous health and food sovereignty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.