Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39616295›Full record

SynthesisAnnals of surgical oncology2025

Prehabilitation Outcomes in Surgical Oncology Patients Undergoing Major Abdominal Surgery: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Control Trials.

Natalie Hann Soh, Charles Rong Zhang Yau, Xi Zhi Low, Hanis Abdul Kadir, Wei Jing Fong, Mothi Babu Ramalingam, Pei Ling Tan, Kennedy Yao Yi Ng, Ya Ting Hsing, Mingzhe Cai and 4 more

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Annals of surgical oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Frailty in anesthesia.Current opinion in anaesthesiology · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Observational
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. [Prehabilitation].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  14. [App-based prehabilitation: implementation and adherence].Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Natalie Hann Soh *Department of Sarcoma, Peritoneal and Rare Tumours (SPRinT), Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore & Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Charles Rong Zhang Yau *Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
Xi Zhi LowDuke-NUS Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
Hanis Abdul KadirHealth Services Research Unit, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Wei Jing FongDepartment of Sarcoma, Peritoneal and Rare Tumours (SPRinT), Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore & Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Mothi Babu RamalingamDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Pei Ling TanDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Kennedy Yao Yi NgDivision of Medical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore, Singapore.
Ya Ting HsingDepartment of Physiotherapy, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Mingzhe CaiDepartment of Sarcoma, Peritoneal and Rare Tumours (SPRinT), Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore & Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Chin Jin SeoDepartment of Sarcoma, Peritoneal and Rare Tumours (SPRinT), Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore & Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Johnny Chin-Ann OngDepartment of Sarcoma, Peritoneal and Rare Tumours (SPRinT), Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore & Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Claramae S ChiaDepartment of Sarcoma, Peritoneal and Rare Tumours (SPRinT), Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore & Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Jolene Si Min WongDepartment of Sarcoma, Peritoneal and Rare Tumours (SPRinT), Division of Surgery and Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Centre Singapore & Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore. jolenewong.sm@gmail.com.

Funding

National Research Council Clinician Scientist-Individual Research Grant CIRG21jun-0038
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrehabilitation has been increasingly utilized to optimize perioperative outcomes. In this study, we aim to evaluate the impact of uni- and multimodal prehabilitation on functional capacity and postoperative outcomes among surgical oncology patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. PATIENTS AND

methodsThree electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane) were systematically searched up until December 2023. We included randomized controlled trials comparing prehabilitation to standard of care in surgical oncology patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. Our primary outcome was functional capacity as measured by the 6-min walk distance (6MWD). Secondary outcomes include postoperative complications, emergency readmissions, and length of stay (LOS). We stratified our findings to determine the impact of uni- versus multimodal prehabilitation on outcomes.

resultsWe included 27 studies with 2532 surgical oncology patients. Overall, patients undergoing prehabilitation demonstrated a significant improvement in preoperative functional capacity compared to those without prehabilitation (mean difference in 6MWD 28.32 meters [m], 95% CI 15.26, 41.39, p < 0.01). Prehabilitation was also associated with significantly lower odds of postoperative complications (odds ratio [OR] 0.60, 95% CI 0.46, 0.78, p < 0.01). There was no difference in emergency readmission (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.59, 1.38, p = 0.61) or LOS (mean difference -0.42 days, 95% CI -1.01, 0.16, p = 0.15). Comparing uni- versus multimodal prehabilitation, multimodal prehabilitation was associated with greater improvements in functional capacity (6MWD 37.35 m versus 13.38 m) and lower odds of postoperative complications (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.45, 0.82, p < 0.01 versus OR 0.63, 95% CI 0.36, 1.11, p = 0.10)

conclusionPrehabilitation improves functional capacity and reduces postoperative complications among surgical oncology patients undergoing major abdominal surgery.

Indexed as

AbdomenRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSurgical OncologyHumansLength of StayNeoplasmsPostoperative ComplicationsPreoperative CarePreoperative ExercisePrognosisTreatment OutcomeAbdominalCancerMeta-analysisPrehabilitationSurgerySurgical oncology

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.