Evidence mapPaperPMID 39616309Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2024

Management of obesity with semaglutide or metformin in patients with antipsychotic-induced weight gain (MOSA): a non-randomised open-label pilot study.

Bea Campforts, Marjan Drukker, Therese van Amelsvoort, Maarten Bak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Bea CampfortsDepartment of Psychiatry & Neuropsychology, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, Maastricht, 6200, MD, The Netherlands. bea.campforts@maastrichtuniversity.nl.
Marjan DrukkerDepartment of Psychiatry & Neuropsychology, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, Maastricht, 6200, MD, The Netherlands.
Therese van AmelsvoortDepartment of Psychiatry & Neuropsychology, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, Maastricht, 6200, MD, The Netherlands.
Maarten BakDepartment of Psychiatry & Neuropsychology, Maastricht University, PO Box 616, Maastricht, 6200, MD, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntipsychotic-induced weight gain (AIWG) represents a significant clinical challenge for both patients and clinicians, requiring appropriate interventions to prevent or reverse weight gain in patients using antipsychotics. Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1) agonists represent a novel approach to the management of obesity that has recently attracted considerable attention. Semaglutide (a GLP-1 agonist) has been demonstrated to result in notable weight loss. The present study investigates whether semaglutide is equally effective in achieving weight loss in patients with AIWG.

methodsA prospective, non-randomised cohort study was conducted with the objective of evaluating the efficacy and safety of oral semaglutide for the treatment of AIWG in routine outpatient clinical practice. Subsequently, the results were compared with those of a control group of AIWG patients taking metformin.

resultsAfter 16 weeks, the mean body weight loss was 4.5 kg (95% confidence interval (CI), -6.7 to -2.3 kg; p < 0.001) in the semaglutide group (n = 10) versus 2.9 kg (95% CI, -4.5 to -1.4 kg; p < 0.001) in the metformin group (n = 26). This corresponds to an average body weight loss of 4% for semaglutide, and 2.5% for metformin. The respective reductions in body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference were -1.7 kg/m2 (95% CI, -2.4 to -1.0 kg/m2; p < 0.001) and -6.8 cm (95% CI, -9.7 to -3.8 cm; p < 0.001) for semaglutide. The observed reductions for metformin were -0.8 kg/m2 (95% CI, -1.4 to -0.3 kg/m2; p = 0.001) and -3.4 cm (95% CI, -5.4 to -1.3 cm; p = 0.001). The differences between the two groups were not statistically significant. In both groups, adverse effects were typically mild and transient, predominantly nausea. Furthermore, psychiatric symptoms were reduced, and quality of life improved.

conclusionsOral semaglutide represents a viable, effective, and safe treatment option for psychiatric patients. However, further investigation is required to corroborate these findings.

Indexed as

Antipsychotic AgentsGlucagon-Like PeptidesMetforminObesityWeight GainAdultBody Mass IndexFemaleHumansHypoglycemic AgentsMaleMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsProspective StudiesSemaglutideTreatment OutcomeAntipsychotic AgentsGlucagon-Like PeptidesHypoglycemic AgentsMetforminSemaglutideAntipsychotic-induced weight gainGLP-1 agonistMetforminObesitySemaglutide

Identifiers

PMID39616309
PMCPMC11607825

What Socratic holds

Texttitle and abstract
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.