ArticleFolia microbiologica2025
Isolation, evolution, and biological characterization of non-virulent and non-drug-resistant Escherichia coli from porcine intestine.
Article in Folia microbiologica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Previous studies have predominantly focused on the pathogenic mechanisms and epidemiological investigations of pathogenic Escherichia coli (E. coli), but much remains unknown about the non-virulent and non-drug-resistant E. coli (NVNR E. coli) residing in the pig gut. In this study, 215 E. coli strains were identified from fecal samples collected from 26 healthy pigs in Guangdong Province, China. Among them, 12 NVNR E. coli strains were identified through PCR, antibiotic susceptibility tests, and genomic virulence analysis. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that 8 of these NVNR E. coli strains were located in the upstream cluster of the phylogenetic tree, which we consider as the ancestral phylogroup of porcine native E. coli. Notably, strain 2-9 showed a close evolutionary relationship with the probiotics Nissle1917 and EcAZ-1, suggesting it may also be a probiotic strain. These 9 strains (i.e., the 8 ancestral phylogroup strains and the suspected probiotic strain) were designated as evolutionarily superior strains. The 12 NVNR E. coli strains were non-hemolytic and exhibited growth rates comparable to typical E. coli strains, but they varied significantly in their tolerance to gastrointestinal conditions and adherence to IPEC-J2 cells. Most of them lacked the ability to inhibit pathogenic E. coli. Interestingly, the majority of strains exhibiting strong gastrointestinal tolerance, most of those with high adhesion capacity, and all strains possessing antibacterial ability, were found within the range of 9 evolutionarily superior strains. These findings suggest that 9 strains have shown great potential as superior porcine native E. coli strains and warrant further study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39617849What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.