Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39618027›Full record

ArticleNucleus (Austin, Tex.)2024

Proteome-wide forced interactions reveal a functional map of cell-cycle phospho-regulation in

Cinzia Klemm, Guðjón Ólafsson, Henry Richard Wood, Caitlin Mellor, Nicolae Radu Zabet, Peter Harold Thorpe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleus (Austin, Tex.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Cinzia KlemmSchool of Biological and Behavioural Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3198-4439
Guðjón ÓlafssonSchool of Biological and Behavioural Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7284-1680
Henry Richard WoodSchool of Biological and Behavioural Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Caitlin MellorSchool of Biological and Behavioural Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
Nicolae Radu ZabetBlizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9964-6271
Peter Harold ThorpeSchool of Biological and Behavioural Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.

Funding

Wellcome Trust FC001183
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dynamic protein phosphorylation and dephosphorylation play an essential role in cell cycle progression. Kinases and phosphatases are generally highly conserved across eukaryotes, underlining their importance for post-translational regulation of substrate proteins. In recent years, advances in phospho-proteomics have shed light on protein phosphorylation dynamics throughout the cell cycle, and ongoing progress in bioinformatics has significantly improved annotation of specific phosphorylation events to a given kinase. However, the functional impact of individual phosphorylation events on cell cycle progression is often unclear. To address this question, we used the Synthetic Physical Interactions (SPI) method, which enables the systematic recruitment of phospho-regulators to most yeast proteins. Using this method, we identified several putative novel targets involved in chromosome segregation and cytokinesis. The SPI method monitors cell growth and, therefore, serves as a tool to determine the impact of protein phosphorylation on cell cycle progression.

Indexed as

Cell CycleProteomeSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsPhosphorylationProteomeSaccharomyces cerevisiae ProteinsCdc5Cdc7CDKcell cyclephosphatasesphospho-regulationsynthetic physical interactions

Identifiers

PMID39618027
PMCPMC11622623

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.