ReviewCureus2024
Effect of Increased Level of Lipoprotein(a) on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Ischemic Heart Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) has emerged as a significant cardiovascular risk factor, particularly in patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD). This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to synthesize evidence on the impact of Lp(a) levels on cardiovascular outcomes in IHD patients. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across multiple databases, covering publications from January 2016 to October 2024. Studies assessing the relationship between Lp(a) levels and cardiovascular outcomes in IHD patients were included. The primary outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, and revascularization. Quality assessment was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Fourteen studies (five prospective, nine retrospective) met the inclusion criteria, with sample sizes ranging from 350 to 18,544 participants. Pooled analysis revealed that elevated Lp(a) levels were significantly associated with increased risk of MACE (HR: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.19-1.45), all-cause mortality (HR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.15-1.31), myocardial infarction (HR: 1.20, 95% CI: 1.06-1.35), and revascularization (HR: 1.23, 95% CI: 1.08-1.39) in IHD patients. Sensitivity analyses confirmed the robustness of these findings. This meta-analysis provides strong evidence that elevated Lp(a) levels are associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes in IHD patients. The findings underscore the potential role of Lp(a) as an important prognostic marker and suggest that incorporating Lp(a) assessment into clinical practice could enhance risk stratification. Future research should focus on establishing optimal Lp(a) cutoff values and evaluating the impact of Lp(a)-lowering therapies on cardiovascular outcomes in this high-risk population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.