Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39618686›Full record

ReviewVascular health and risk management2024

Non-Contrast MRI Sequences for Ischemic Stroke: A Concise Overview for Clinical Radiologists.

Nur Amelia Bachtiar, Bachtiar Murtala, Mirna Muis, Muhammad I Ilyas, Hamzaini Bin Abdul Hamid, Suryani As'ad, Jumraini Tammasse, Audry Devisanty Wuysang, Gita Vita Soraya

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vascular health and risk management, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nur Amelia BachtiarDepartment of Radiology, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0003-3449-4144
Bachtiar MurtalaDepartment of Radiology, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0003-1901-4560
Mirna MuisDepartment of Radiology, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, Indonesia.
Muhammad I IlyasDepartment of Radiology, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, Indonesia.
Hamzaini Bin Abdul HamidDepartment of Radiology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
Suryani As'adFaculty of Medicine, Muhammadiyah University, Makassar, Indonesia.
Jumraini TammasseDepartment of Neurology, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, Indonesia.ORCID 0009-0003-2785-8779
Audry Devisanty WuysangDepartment of Neurology, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, Indonesia.
Gita Vita SorayaDepartment of Neurology, Hasanuddin University, Makassar, Indonesia.ORCID 0000-0002-2656-4176

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ischemic stroke is the second leading cause of mortality and morbidity worldwide. Due to the urgency of implementing immediate therapy, acute stroke necessitates prompt diagnosis. The current gold standards for vascular imaging in stroke include computed tomography angiography (CTA), digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA). However, the contrast agents used in these methods can be costly and pose risks for patients with renal impairment or allergies. The aim of this paper is to provide a comprehensive overview of current MRI techniques and sequences for evaluating ischemic stroke, emphasizing the importance of non-contrast options and their clinical implications for radiologists in the diagnosis and management of ischemic stroke. Standard MRI sequences-such as T1-weighted imaging (T1WI), T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), DWI-FLAIR mismatch, and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC)-are essential for determining infarct location, volume, and age. Additionally, incorporating susceptibility-weighted imaging (SWI) sequence aids in identifying signs of hemorrhagic transformation within the infarcted region. Advanced techniques like arterial spin labeling (ASL) can serve as a non-contrast alternative for mapping cerebral blood flow (CBF) and allowing for comparison between infarcted and healthy brain areas. Adding ASL to the routine sequence allows ASL-DWI mismatch analysis that is useful for quantifying salvageable tissue volume and facilitate timely recanalization, while time-of-flight (TOF) MRA and magnetic resonance venography (MRV) help assess venous thrombosis, stenosis, or arterial occlusions. Finally, MR spectroscopy can provide insights into critical brain metabolites, including N-acetylaspartate (NAA), and lactate (Lac) to determine patient prognosis. Current MRI technology provides a myriad of sequence options for the comprehensive evaluation of ischemic stroke without the need for contrast material. A thorough understanding of the advantages and limitations of each sequence is crucial for its optimal implementation in diagnosis and treatment.

Indexed as

Ischemic StrokePredictive Value of TestsCerebrovascular CirculationHumansMagnetic Resonance AngiographyMagnetic Resonance ImagingPrognosisRadiologistsReproducibility of Resultsischemic strokeMRI sequencesnon-contrast MRI

Identifiers

PMID39618686
PMCPMC11608002

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.