SynthesisReviews in cardiovascular medicine2024
Comparison of Sutureless Aortic Valve Replacement and Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Propensity Score Matching.
Synthesis in Reviews in cardiovascular medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transcatheter Versus Minimally Invasive Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement With Rapid-Deployment Valves: A Propensity-Matched Analysis.Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery · 2026Article
- Exploring Use-Rates of and Scientific Evidence on Sutureless Devices in Aortic Valve Replacement: A Bibliographic Meta-Analysis and Clinical Considerations.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Current Landscape in the Management of Aortic Stenosis.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: To evaluate the clinical outcomes of sutureless aortic valve replacement (SUAVR) and transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). Methods: We systematically searched the electronic database and the Clinical Trials Registry up to 31 February 2023. Random effects model risk ratio ( Results: The included 16 studies using propensity-matched analysis consisted of 6516 patients, including 3258 patients in the SUAVR group and 3258 patients in the TAVI group. The SUAVR group had lower mortality than the TAVI group at 1-year [ Conclusions: The early and mid-term clinical outcomes of SUAVR were superior compared to TAVI. Further studies should be conducted to highlight the specific subgroups of patients. that will benefit from each technique. INPLASY Registration Number: INPLASY 2022110058 (https://inplasy.com/inplasy-2022-11-0058/).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.