ArticleHeart views : the official journal of the Gulf Heart Association
Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings in COVID-19: Experience from a Tertiary Care Center of North India.
Article in Heart views : the official journal of the Gulf Heart Association. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Here, we describe cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) findings in patients with proven COVID-19 infection and presenting with cardiac problems both at presentation and in convalescence from a tertiary care center, in North India. A pertinent review of the literature is also discussed. Materials and Methods: Retrospective analysis of patients with real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction proven COVID-19 infection either at presentation or convalescence referred for CMR at our facility from January 2021 to December 2023 was done. CMR was performed on a 3T system (Ingenia, Philips Healthcare, Best, The Netherlands) and examinations were customized according to the clinical indications. Results: Retrospective analysis yielded 14 patients (4 at presentation; 10 in convalescence). Patients at presentation 4/14 had clinically presented with chest pain with raised troponins and electrographic abnormalities, while 10/14 patients had presented with clinical features of heart failure with two-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography demonstrating systolic dysfunction with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. Out of 14, 4 patients at presentation, CMR showed features of acute myocarditis in three patients, while one had inferior wall myocardial infarction (MI) (this patient on catheter angiogram had aneurysmally dilated coronary arteries with thrombus and stenosis in the mid right coronary artery which was successfully stented). Out of 14, 10 patients on CMR had features of dilated cardiomyopathy (DCMP). Conclusion: Cardiac involvement in COVID-19 can have vivid clinicoradiological presentations with features of myocarditis and MI at presentation or DCMP in convalescence. CMR in such cases is a problem-solving tool where myocarditis is candidly differentiated from MI. Moreover, follow-up CMR demonstrates temporal changes in COVID-19-associated myocarditis and evaluation of cardiac structure and function in patients presenting with DCMP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.