SynthesisPeerJ2024
The impact of doctor-patient communication on medication adherence and blood pressure control in patients with hypertension: a systematic review.
Synthesis in PeerJ, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Communication and medical errors: a bibliometric analysis of research trends and knowledge structures.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Pooled it
- Prevalence and factors influencing medication adherence after acute myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2026Review
- Doctor-patient communication in community-dwelling patients with essential hypertension: a cross-sectional study.Internal and emergency medicine · 2026Article
- Challenges and Perspectives in Optimising the Treatment of Arterial Hypertension: Role of the Ramipril-Amlodipine-Hydrochlorothiazide Single-Pill Combination.High blood pressure & cardiovascular prevention : the official journal of the Italian Society of Hypertension · 2026Review
- Patients' Perspective of Medication Safety in a Structurally Burdened Healthcare System: A Netnography-Based Qualitative Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Article
- [Analysis of Factors Affecting Endoscopic Follow-up Compliance in High-Risk Patients With Early Gastrointestinal Cancer].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2026Article
- Race and Patient-Physician Communication on Blood Pressure Management: Helping Improve Care.Current cardiology reports · 2026Review
- Pattern of Healthcare Utilization Related to Hypertension and Associated Factors: A Survey Study in the Capital of Iran.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2026Article
- Translation and validation of the Chinese version of quality of physician-patient interaction scale.International journal of nursing studies advances · 2025Article
- Hypertensive patient's journey in Poland.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- Promoting xenomorphic patient-facing AIs: The case against anthropomorphism in medical AIs.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Review
- Exploration of doctor-patient communication characteristics and optimization path for gastrointestinal surgery of acute abdomen.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2025Article
- Mapping Research Trends on the Implications of Telemedicine for Healthcare Professionals: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Psychosocial Determinants of Antidepressant Adherence Among Hungarian Adults: A Cross-Sectional Online Survey.Patient preference and adherence · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: This systematic review aims to present existing evidence concerning the effects of doctor-patient communication on medication adherence and blood pressure control in hypertensive patients. Methods: Two researchers independently conducted comprehensive searches of five databases and screened relevant studies published from the inception of these databases up to July 21, 2024. The titles, abstracts, and full texts of all the retrieved articles subsequently underwent rigorous duplicate screening, according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. We then synthesized the findings in a narrative format of the included studies. Finally, two researchers independently assessed study quality. Results: Eighteen observational studies encompassing 21,542 patients and seven randomized controlled trials with 2,804 patients were included in the systematic review. Diverse approaches were employed for evaluating doctor-patient communication and medication adherence in these studies, with identified themes including communication content and communication skills. Various facets of doctor-patient communication, including patient satisfaction with doctor-patient communication, the specific content discussed, the style of communication, the comprehensive communication skills of doctors, and the duration of these conversations, were scrutinized. In general, the results suggest a promising link between effective doctor-patient communication and increased medication adherence and blood pressure control. Nonetheless, the presence of nuanced variations and subtle distinctions within the literature underscores the imperative for deeper exploration and consideration in clinical practice. Additionally, effective communication interventions must attain a certain threshold of intensity and endure for an adequate duration. Conclusion: This review underscores the pivotal role of robust doctor-patient communication in improving both medication adherence and blood pressure control. Nevertheless, additional research may be warranted to address the disparities and subtleties in the literature and to establish precise implications for clinical practice. Moreover, in clinical practice, strategies to enhance doctor-patient communication should be incorporated, given the potential to improve medication adherence and blood pressure control among hypertensive patients. Trial registration: Systematic review registration: PROSPERO with registration number CRD42024503112.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.