ReviewFrontiers in transplantation2024
A review of cell-free DNA and epigenetics for non-invasive diagnosis in solid organ transplantation.
Review in Frontiers in transplantation, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Characterizing Early Donor-Derived cfDNA Kinetics in Stable Pediatric Living-Donor Liver Transplant Recipients.Pediatric transplantation · 2026Article
- Risk Phenotyping Before Graft Implantation: FTIR Spectroscopy and Machine Learning for Complementary Risk Stratification in Kidney Transplantation.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Establishment and Performance Evaluation of a Multiplexed TET2-APOBEC-Mediated cfDNA Methylation Detection Workflow Using qPCR and dPCR Readouts.Journal of personalized medicine · 2026Article
- From the Bench to the Bedside and Back: Contemporary Applications of Basic Science to Innovations in Heart Transplantation.The Canadian journal of cardiology · 2026Review
- Advances in donor-derived cell-free DNA monitoring for solid organ transplantation.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Donor-derived cell-free DNA in solid organ transplantation: analytical considerations, diagnostic performance, and clinical interpretation.Clinical transplantation and research · 2025Review
- Epigenetic Profiling of Cell-Free DNA in Cerebrospinal Fluid: A Novel Biomarker Approach for Metabolic Brain Diseases.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Advances and challenges in the application of donor-derived cell-free DNA for diagnosis and treatment in liver transplantation: a narrative review.BMC surgery · 2025Review
- %dd-cfDNA: The New Frontier for Heart/Lung Transplant Surveillance?Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is emerging as a non-invasive biomarker in solid organ transplantation (SOT) monitoring and data on its diagnostic potential have been increasing in recent years. This review aims to summarize the main advances in technologies, clinical applications and future perspectives of cfDNA for transplantation, and to approach the contribution of epigenetics to improve the specific detection of rejection. Methods: Published literature investigating cfDNA as a biomarker for the diagnosis of transplant rejection was systematically reviewed, specifically clinical trials evaluating the test performance of algorithms predicting rejection based on cfDNA fraction. Literature highlighting epigenetic features in transplant rejection was also reviewed to outline the potential contribution of the epigenomic analysis to the needs of rejection-specific diagnosis. Results: 40 articles were reviewed, and results were extracted and summarized. 16 met the inclusion criteria by evaluating the diagnostic performance of a predictive test for the discrimination of rejection vs. non-rejection patients (2 heart, 3 liver, 4 kidney, and 7 lung transplantations). The recurring conclusion is the kinetics of dd-cfDNA levels, strongly increasing immediately after transplantation and reaching basal levels after days to weeks and remaining stable in non-rejection patients. On the other hand, rejection is characterized by an increase in dd-cfDNA levels, depending on the transplanted organs. In addition, the epigenetic signature can help improve the specificity of the diagnosis of rejection by searching for specific epigenetic features that are by the clinical status of patients. Conclusion: Cell-free DNA is a promising non-invasive biomarker but still needs standardization of technologies and protocols to be used for diagnostic purposes. Moreover, the lack of specificity of this marker can be compensated by the contribution of epigenetic analysis for which data are growing, although progress is still needed for its use in a clinical context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.