SynthesisFrontiers in aging2024
Cellular senescence in acute human infectious disease: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Frontiers in aging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Longitudinal infection trajectories and biological aging acceleration in adults: a prospective cohort study.GeroScience · 2026Article
- Acyl-CoA-binding protein (ACBP): a poor-prognosis biomarker in sepsis and a target for disease mitigation.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026Article
- Frailty and the risk of ICU-acquired infections in a randomised trial: a protocol and statistical analysis plan.BMJ open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Methods: Embase via OVID, Scopus, Web of Science, Global Index Medicus, Cochrane Library via Wiley, and ClinicalTrials.gov were queried. Included studies must have compared at least one of the following measures of cellular senescence between patients with an infection and without an infection: cell cycle inhibition measured via levels of Results: A total of 15,828 studies were screened after duplicates were removed. One hundred and fifty-three full-text articles were assessed for eligibility and a total of 16 original articles were included in analysis. Of the 16 original articles included, 12 (75%) articles were centered on SARS-CoV-2, 2 (12.5%) articles utilized patients infected with Conclusion: Current literature demonstrates robust upregulation of markers of cellular senescence in the setting of acute SARS-CoV-2, Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=421473, Identifier CRD42023421473.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.