ArticleJournal of the ASEAN Federation of Endocrine Societies2024
Intentional Hyperglycemia at work, Glycemic Control, Work-related Diabetes Distress and Work Ability among Workers with Diabetes.
Article in Journal of the ASEAN Federation of Endocrine Societies, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Workability among migrant diabetic workers: An occupational health-clinic-based study, Kuwait.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Work life of individuals with diabetes differs from that of those without diabetes. Work may interfere with diabetes self-management tasks, resulting in intentional hyperglycemia at work (IHW) and poor glycemic control. Diabetes affects work productivity due to work-related diabetes distress (WRDD) and impaired work ability (WA). Objectives: To estimate the prevalence and identify the predictors of always high, poor/very poor glycemic control, high WRDD and poor/moderate WA among workers with diabetes. Methodology: A cross-sectional study was done at the Specialized Medical Hospital Mansoura University, which included 323 working patients with diabetes. They were subjected to personal interviews to collect socio-demographic data, occupational, diabetes and other pertinent medical histories. Questionnaires for measuring IHW, WRDD and WA were completed. Clinical and A1c data were obtained from their records. Results: The prevalence of always high IHW, poor/very poor glycemic control, high WRDD and poor/moderate work ability was: 23.8%, 60.1%, 34.7% and 74.6%, respectively. The predictors of always high IHW were: 1) Below university education; 2) Treatment with insulin only or combined with oral drugs; and 3) High WRDD. The predictors of poor/very poor glycemic control were urban residence, always and almost high IHW. The predictors of high WRDD were mentallyrequiring jobs or both mentally- and physically-requiring jobs, duration of diabetes greater than 14 years and treatment with insulin. The predictors of poor/moderate WA were 'high' WRDD, 'almost high' and 'high a few times' IHW ratings. Conclusions: Most of the studied population suffered mainly from poor/very poor glycemic control and poor/moderate work ability, while a lower proportion had high WRDD. This highlighted the need for workplace modifications and interventions to help workers with diabetes control their diabetes, improve their work ability and reduce WRDD to increase productivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.