Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39620563›Full record

ReviewEFORT open reviews2024

Systemic antibiotic prophylaxis in arthroplasty - a narrative review of how many doses are optimal.

Peter Wahl, Philip Drennan, Michel Schläppi, Yvonne Achermann, Michael Leunig, Emanuel Gautier, Emanuel Benninger

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EFORT open reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Peter WahlDivision of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-8895-8621
Philip DrennanKennedy Institute, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Michel SchläppiDivision of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland.
Yvonne AchermannDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hospital Zollikerberg, Zurich, Switzerland.
Michael LeunigDepartment of Orthopedics, Schulthess Clinic, Zurich, Switzerland.
Emanuel GautierDepartment of Orthopaedics, HFR Fribourg - Cantonal Hospital, Fribourg, Switzerland.
Emanuel BenningerDivision of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Systemic antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP) is well-established in arthroplasty to prevent periprosthetic joint infection. However, the optimal duration and dosing of SAP remain a matter of debate, as evidenced by ongoing discordance between recommendations and clinical practice, reflected in the heterogeneity and imprecision of national and societal guidelines. The evidence currently available regarding the duration of SAP is summarised and discussed, specifically the postoperative repeated administration of antimicrobials within the first 24 h. The evidence available suffers from limitations, specifically deficiencies in outcome assessments in the available randomised controlled trials. Observational studies suggest that a short postoperative prolongation (<24 h) of SAP in arthroplasty may result in superior long-term outcomes compared to a single dose, and that an optimal dosing strategy, which warrants further prospective evaluation, may involve 'stacked dosing' in the early postoperative period, with re-administration every two half-lives when using commonly recommended beta-lactam antibiotics, instead of repetition at usual dosing intervals over 24 h. A stacked approach would also cover recognised indications for repetition, such as major blood loss and increased duration of operation, potentially simplifying prescribing protocols. Pharmacokinetic simulations are provided to illustrate the distinct concentration-time profiles associated with different prophylaxis regimens. Prolonging SAP beyond 24 h is not recommended. This review concludes by providing recommendations for further research, particularly a call to document SAP regimens with sufficient detail (choice of drug, dose regimen, and duration of administration) into established national arthroplasty registries, which should rapidly enable a significantly more nuanced understanding of these critical issues than permitted by the current literature.

Indexed as

antibioticsarthroplastypostoperativeprolongedprophylaxisrepeated dosing

Identifiers

PMID39620563
PMCPMC11619733

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.