SynthesisThe Journal of cardiovascular nursing
Cardiovascular Health Disparities in Adults of Color Aged 18 to 50: A Systematic Review.
Synthesis in The Journal of cardiovascular nursing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlthough cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of death among US adults of color, there is a limited understanding of cardiovascular health status, including health behaviors (sleep health, diet, physical activity, and nicotine exposure) and health factors (body mass index, blood lipids, blood glucose, and blood pressure). PURPOSE/
methodsThe objective of this systematic review was to synthesize original research on racial and ethnic disparities in CVH among US adults aged 18 to 50 years using Life's Simple 7 and Life's Essential 8 metrics. Multiple electronic databases (PubMed, PsycINFO, and CINAHL) were searched for relevant original studies published in English until March 28, 2023.
resultsFifteen original descriptive studies were selected (N = 364 426, mean age = 39.2 ± 8.4 years, 64.6% female, 65.4% non-Hispanic White [NHW], 10.7% non-Hispanic Black [NHB], 11.7% Hispanic, 6.2% multiracial 0.6% non-Hispanic Asian, and <1% American). There were race-, sex-, and age-based differences in CVH scores. People of color had lower CVH scores when compared with NHW, and NHB had the lowest CVH of all racial groups. Males had lower CVH and higher rates of low CVH across most racial groups. However, NHB women had lower CVH scores than NHB men on average compared with these other groups. CONCLUSIONS/CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The findings of this review contribute to understanding CVH disparities among US adults of color. Ideal CVH is associated with a lower cardiovascular disease risk; therefore, further research is needed to estimate CVH among a racially and ethnically representative sample of US adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.