ReviewJournal of robotic surgery2024
Barriers and recommendations for the implementation of robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery in Africa.
Review in Journal of robotic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The global surgical workforce crisis: narrative review of the role of surgical educator development and technological innovations.Surgery today · 2026Review
- Closing the global surgical divide: histotripsy, a pathway to universal access?Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
- Scaling surgical care capacity in Nigeria: a narrative review of current practices and innovations in rural surgical workforce development.BMC surgery · 2025Review
- Bridging the gap: feasibility and future directions of robotic surgery in Sub-Saharan Africa-a narrative review.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Review
- Orienting global surgery initiatives toward advancing minimally invasive surgery in Africa: a commentary based on continent-wide reviews.BMC surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Robotic surgery offers several advantages to the African setting, including shorter hospital stays, faster return to work, and increased overall productivity. However, its adoption has been limited by several factors. This review aims to present the barriers to implementation, and recommendations for integrating robotic surgery into the African healthcare system. Use of robotic surgery in Africa is primarily limited to Egypt and South Africa. Barriers faced by other countries were categorized into economic, infrastructural, systemic, and training-related. They include limited healthcare budgets, initial costs of robotic systems, patients' inability to afford robotic procedures, out-of-pocket healthcare financing, inadequate power supply, limited internet connectivity, poor healthcare leadership, and insufficient surgeon training facilities. Public-private partnerships, provision of loans and subsidies, introduction of cheaper robotic systems, and local manufacturing of robotic equipment will serve as cost-effective innovations. It is also important to improve healthcare financing and strengthen healthcare leadership across Africa. To address the lack of surgeon training facilities, remote assistance for surgeon training can be used to create a mentor-mentee relationship between robotic surgeons in any part of the world and surgical trainees in Africa to facilitate knowledge transfer. Prior investment in electricity and network infrastructure is however necessary. Establishment of fellowships to provide early exposure to robotic surgery should also be explored. AI-integrated robotic surgery can also enhance precision and safety, and provide tailored training tools for surgeons. Similar barriers to the adoption of surgical robotics are faced across Africa. By implementing the provided recommendations, robotic surgery can still be widely adopted in African settings, despite the delay.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39621167What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.