ReviewBlood research2024
How to improve AML outcomes?
Review in Blood research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Cytogenetic risk-associated outcomes of antithymocyte globulin use in HLA-matched sibling transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia.Annals of hematology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Understanding the intricacies of the pathophysiology and genomic landscape has enhanced the long-term outcomes for patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The identification of novel molecular targets has introduced new therapeutic strategies that attempt to surpass the dominance of the "7 + 3 regimen" established in the 1970s. In 2022, the World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification revised their definitions and approaches to AML, reflecting the current and evolving changes at the molecular level. The guidelines are now grounded in a definition of the disease that emphasizes genetic characteristics. Today, we recognize AML as a genetically diverse disease; a retrospective study identified 5234 driver mutations across 76 genes or genomic regions, with two or more drivers observed in 86% of patients (Papaemmanuil et al., N Engl J Med 374:2209-21, 2016).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.