Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39621906›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2024

Opportunities and challenges of plant proteins as functional ingredients for food production.

Lara Etzbach, Susanne Gola, Fabian Küllmer, Ismail-Hakki Acir, Daria Wohlt, Laura Melanie Ignatzy, Stephanie Bader-Mittermaier, Ute Schweiggert-Weisz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Impact of biomanufacturing protein fibers on achieving sustainable development.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Sustainability of animal-sourced foods and plant-based alternatives.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Lara Etzbach *Institute for Nutritional and Food Sciences, University of Bonn, Bonn 53115, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9900-7648
Susanne Gola *Fraunhofer Institute for Process Engineering and Packaging, Freising 85354, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6838-5574
Fabian KüllmerInstitute for Nutritional and Food Sciences, University of Bonn, Bonn 53115, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-1281-0564
Ismail-Hakki AcirInstitute for Nutritional and Food Sciences, University of Bonn, Bonn 53115, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-7250-1427
Daria WohltFraunhofer Institute for Process Engineering and Packaging, Freising 85354, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6990-9533
Laura Melanie IgnatzyFraunhofer Institute for Process Engineering and Packaging, Freising 85354, Germany.ORCID 0009-0000-1336-6026
Stephanie Bader-MittermaierFraunhofer Institute for Process Engineering and Packaging, Freising 85354, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4251-016X
Ute Schweiggert-WeiszFraunhofer Institute for Process Engineering and Packaging, Freising 85354, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0223-6124

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) 031B0956ABundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung (BMBF) 031B0956Q
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Consumer interest in meat and dairy alternatives drives demand for plant-based protein ingredients. While soy and gluten dominate the market, there is a trend to explore alternative crops for functional ingredient production. The multitude of ingredients poses challenges for food manufacturers in selecting the right protein. We investigated 61 commercially available protein ingredients from various sources, categorizing them based on their protein content into protein-rich flours (protein content less than 50%), protein concentrates (protein content between 50% and 80%), and protein isolates (protein content higher than 80%). Methionine, cysteine, and lysine were decisive for the amino acid score, which even varied between ingredients produced from the same raw material. Such differences were also observed in the protein solubility profiles, characterized by their raw material-specific protein pattern. By focusing on soy, pea, and fava bean ingredients, the broad spectra of emulsifying and foaming properties were illustrated. These ranged from non-emulsifying and non-foaming to high emulsifying capacities of 737 mL/g ingredient and foaming activities of 2,278%, accompanied by a foam stability of 100%. Additionally, we demonstrated that the functionality of ingredients obtained from different batches could vary by up to 24% relative SD. Protein solubility, powder wettability, color, and particle size were determined as key properties for the differentiation of soy, pea, and fava bean protein ingredients by principal component analysis. In our study conclusion, we propose essential measures for overcoming challenges in protein ingredient production and utilization to realize their full potential in fostering sustainable and innovative plant-based food production.

Indexed as

Plant ProteinsAmino AcidsFlourFood IngredientsFunctional FoodGlycine maxSolubilityVicia fabaAmino AcidsFood IngredientsPlant Proteinscommercial proteinfood formulationingredient compositioningredient functionalityplant-based food

Identifiers

PMID39621906
PMCPMC11648661

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.