ReviewBritish journal of haematology2025
Clinical perspectives on post-induction maintenance therapy in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia in remission who are ineligible for allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
Review in British journal of haematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Immune monitoring for relapse of acute myeloid leukemia after allogeneic stem cell transplantation in clinical laboratories.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Antibody therapies in glioblastoma: Overcoming micro-environmental barriers.Iranian journal of basic medical sciences · 2026Review
- Clinical perspectives on post-induction maintenance therapy in patients with acute myeloid leukaemia in remission who are ineligible for allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation.British journal of haematology · 2025Review
- Acute myeloid leukemia drug resistance: targetable nodes and the clinical trajectory of small-molecule inhibitors.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- Azacitidine as maintenance therapy in pediatricFrontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
For patients with acute myeloid leukaemia (AML) who achieve complete remission (CR) after induction therapy, subsequent allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) reduces the risk of relapse. However, not all patients are eligible, warranting effective alternative maintenance strategies. Oral azacitidine is the only non-targeted therapy approved by both the United States (US) Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency for the maintenance or continued treatment of allo-HSCT-ineligible patients with AML achieving CR or CR with incomplete haematological recovery following induction chemotherapy. Midostaurin and histamine dihydrochloride are approved in Europe as maintenance therapy for AML in remission, and quizartinib is approved in the United States and Europe for the treatment and maintenance of patients with newly diagnosed FLT3-ITD AML. Barriers to maintenance treatment include limited clinical trial data informing appropriate patient and treatment selection, patient preference, financial burden and paucity of real-world data. This article discusses current maintenance treatment guidelines for patients with AML in remission but not proceeding to allo-HSCT and reviews clinical trial data for agents approved for use in remission. Ongoing studies of interest and considerations for future efforts are also discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.