ReviewThe British journal of ophthalmology2025
Genome-wide association studies, Polygenic Risk Scores and Mendelian randomisation: an overview of common genetic epidemiology methods for ophthalmic clinicians.
Review in The British journal of ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Causal relationships between 41 inflammatory cytokines and myopia: a Mendelian randomization study.International journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- The Association between Myopia and Anxiety: A Bidirectional 2-Sample Mendelian Randomization Study.Ophthalmology scienceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Genetic information will be increasingly integrated into clinical eye care within the current generation of ophthalmologists. For monogenic diseases such as retinoblastoma, genetic studies have been relatively straightforward as these conditions result from pathogenic variants in a single gene resulting in large physiological effects. However, most eye diseases result from the cumulative effects of multiple genetic variants and environmental factors. In such diseases, because each variant usually has an individually small effect, genetic studies for complex diseases are comparatively more challenging. This article aims to provide an overview of three genetic epidemiology methods for polygenic (or complex) diseases: genome-wide association studies (GWAS), Polygenic Risk Scores (PRS) and Mendelian randomisation (MR). A GWAS systematically conducts association analyses of a trait of interest against millions of genetic variants, usually in the form of single nucleotide polymorphisms, across the genome. GWAS findings can then be used for PRS construction and MR analyses. To construct a PRS, the cumulative effect of many genetic variants associated with a trait from a prior GWAS is calculated and taken as a quantitative representation of an individual's genetic risk of a complex disease. MR studies analyse an outcome measure against the genetic variants of an exposure, and are particularly useful in investigating causal relations between two traits where randomised controlled trials are not possible or ethical. In addition to explaining the principles of these three genetic epidemiology concepts, this article provides a minimally technical description of their basic methodology that is accessible to the non-expert reader.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.