ArticleBMJ paediatrics open2024
Patient-level analysis of the cost and variation in melatonin prescribing patterns in those under 18 in the North East of England.
Article in BMJ paediatrics open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMelatonin is widely used to promote sleep in both normally developing children and adolescents and those with neurodevelopmental disorders. It has an evidence base as both hypnotic and chronobiotic although the optimum dose and timing remain unclear. There are now a wide variety of different preparations of melatonin both immediate and prolonged release. We reviewed annual national and regional prescribing data and undertook a detailed review of one year of melatonin prescriptions issued to those under 18 within one of the UK's dedicated paediatric hospitals, this included a cost analysis. This was to understand whether prescribing was appropriate, whether behavioural therapies had been recommended first and whether there had been consideration of other causes of poor sleep, such as sleep apnoea.
methodsBetween November 2020 and October 2021, 220 patients under 18 had one or more melatonin prescriptions issued to treat poor sleep. The audit assessed whether prescriptions were issued in accordance with local Melatonin Shared Care Guidance standards that emphasise: an initial behavioural approach, fixed timing, use of licensed preparations and review of benefit. This included a detailed review of electronic patient care records. A cost analysis of the different preparations was also made.Results adherence to the audit were not met for any of the audit standards, only 9% had a prior behavioural intervention, and only 15% had another sleep disorder considered. Community prescribers were more likely to give advice on timing and review any subsequent benefit. The total costs of prescriptions were £13 299 of which £8736 was issued as off licence, liquid suspension.
conclusionThe audit highlighted a lack of knowledge about appropriate melatonin prescribing and led to a trust-wide sleep education programme. It additionally highlighted the cost and potential risk of inappropriate prescribing and a clear need for better access to effective behavioural interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.