SynthesisReproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)2025
The Role of Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor in Mitigating the Risk of Recurrent Miscarriages: A Comprehensive Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Genetic survey of biomarkers at early and mid-pregnancy identifies pregnancy-specialized immune regulation.PLoS genetics · 2026Article
- Early pregnancy with low β-hCG levels progressing to severe preeclampisa: a case report highlighting individualized management strategies.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for recurrent implantation failure: the results of a 5-years cohort study.Scientific reports · 2025Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), a pivotal hematopoietic cytokine, has been noted for its potential to bolster embryo implantation and augment endometrial receptivity. The present meta-analysis endeavors to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of G-CSF in mitigating the incidence of recurrent miscarriages, thereby enriching the clinical evidence supporting its use in treatment protocols. Our exhaustive literature search, concluded on August 25, 2024, spanned across various databases including PubMed, Medline, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Weipu, and Wanfang, to identify and analyze randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that assessed the impact of G-CSF on recurrent miscarriage. Our review incorporated 7 RCTs. The application of G-CSF was linked to a marked reduction in the rate of miscarriage [RR = 0.48, 95% CI (0.27, 0.86), P = 0.01]. Subgroup analysis indicated that the intra-uterine infusion of G-CSF was notably effective in diminishing the miscarriage rate (RR = 0.35, 95% CI (0.18, 0.68), P = 0.002), while subcutaneous administration did not exhibit a significant impact (RR = 0.55, 95% CI (0.26, 1.20), P = 0.13). Moreover, the administration of G-CSF during the ovulatory phase was identified as particularly efficacious in reducing the miscarriage rate (RR = 0.33, 95% CI (0.18, 0.63), P < 0.001). Intrauterine administration of G-CSF, particularly during the ovulatory phase, is associated with a significant decrease in miscarriage risk and an enhancement in the likelihood of a successful pregnancy outcome in patients with a history of recurrent miscarriages. These findings highlight G-CSF's promise as a valuable therapeutic intervention in this medical scenario.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.