ArticleJournal of nanobiotechnology2024
A supervised machine learning tool to predict the bactericidal efficiency of nanostructured surface.
Article in Journal of nanobiotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Antimicrobial nanomaterials at the nanoscale: design principles, mechanisms, and global challenges.Nanoscale advances · 2026Review
- Bacterial secondary metabolites as resistance-modifying adjuvants: microbial origins, molecular mechanisms, and translational relevance.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The emergence and rapid spread of multidrug-resistant bacterial strains is a growing concern of public health. Inspired by the natural bactericidal surfaces of lotus leaves and shark skin, increasing attention has been focused on the use of mechano-bactericidal methods to create surfaces with antibacterial and/or bactericidal effects. There have been several studies exploring the bactericidal effect of nanostructured surfaces under various combinations of parameters. However, the correlation and synergies between these factors still need to be clarified. Recently machine learning (ML), which enables prediction or decision-making based on data, has been used in the field of biomaterials with promising results. In this study, we explored ML in nanotechnology to investigate the antimicrobial potential of nanostructured surfaces. A dataset of nanostructured surfaces and their antimicrobial properties was built by extracting the published literature. Based on the literature review and the distribution of our dataset, 70% bactericidal efficiency was selected as a practical benchmark for our classification model that balances stringent bactericidal performance with achievable targets in diverse conditions. Subsequently, we developed an ML classification model, which demonstrated an 81% accuracy in its predictive capability. A regression model was further developed to predict the value of bactericidal efficiency for nanostructured surfaces. Feature importance analysis of the ML models suggested that nanotopographical features have a greater influence on bactericidal properties than material properties, thus providing insight into the principles of the mechano-bactericidal effect of nanostructured surfaces. Overall, this ML model tool could help researchers to effectively select and design the parameters of the surface structure prior to experimentation, thereby improving the timeliness and reducing the number of experiments and the associated costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.