SynthesisBMC health services research2024
Integration of psychological interventions in multi-sectoral humanitarian programmes: a systematic review.
Synthesis in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Implementation outcomes of the WHO psychosocial intervention problem management plus in humanitarian settings: a systematic review.Epidemiology and psychiatric sciences · 2026Pooled it
- A systematic review of the impact of food and nutrition programs on child nutrition and household food security in Ethiopia.BMC nutrition · 2025Pooled it
- Screening, brief intervention, and referral to treatment compared with treatment as usual for alcohol use in an integrated refugee settlement in Zambia: a hybrid, type 1, randomised controlled trial.The Lancet. Global health · 2026Trial
- Integrated mental health treatment and employment services for refugees with PTSD: randomised controlled trial.BJPsych open · 2026Article
- AWhen screams go unheard: covert violence, women victims, and social denial.BMC women's health · 2026Article
- Maritime Response and Emergency Care for Irregular Migrants: Experiences of Spanish Rescue Professionals.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Mental health in the time of polycrisis: geopolitical determinants and modern psychiatry.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
- Acceptability, feasibility and perceived benefits of integrating mental health and psychosocial support (MHPSS) into disease outbreak response in Western Uganda: a qualitative process evaluation study.BMJ public health · 2026Article
- Changes to Refugee Mental Health During and After a Cross-Sector PTSD Intervention: A Qualitative Longitudinal Study About the Influence of Social Support, Life Events, and Agency.Culture, medicine and psychiatry · 2025Article
- Acceptability and feasibility of CHANGE, a non-specialist worker delivered intervention to address alcohol use disorders and psychological distress among conflict-affected populations in Uganda: a qualitative study.Journal of migration and health · 2025Article
- Contextualising person-centred mental health and psychosocial support (MHPSS) services: A qualitative study of the preferences and experiences of displaced Syrians in Northwest Syria and Türkiye.Global mental health (Cambridge, England) · 2025Article
- Predictors of posttraumatic stress disorder among displaced families in Lebanon: A cross-sectional study.PLOS global public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEvery year, millions of people are affected by humanitarian crises. With a growing population of people affected, the need for coordination and integration of services aiming to improve the effectiveness of mental health and psychosocial support also grows. In this study, we examine how psychological interventions in humanitarian settings globally have been implemented through integration into programming outside of formal healthcare delivery through multisectoral integration.
methodsA comprehensive search of six databases and reference checking was undertaken in 2022. We included studies focusing on implementation strategies and implementation outcomes of multi-sectoral, integrated psychological interventions, with no year limits. We extracted data using the software Covidence, and used the software to manage screening and reviewing processes. All studies were critically appraised for quality and rigor using the mixed-methods appraisal tool.
resultsEight studies were included in total. We found that interventions targeted conflict affected, displaced and disaster recovering populations. The interventions demonstrated moderate success in reducing psychological distress and enhancing disaster preparedness. We found that key implementation outcomes investigated and prioritised include acceptability, feasibility, and relevance. The studies reported on integration processes that involved task shifting primarily, with an emphasis on different formats of adaptation, partnership creation and capacity development to maximise effectiveness of integrated interventions.
conclusionOverall, there is little research being done to rigorously document the processes and experiences of integrating psychological interventions with non-health interventions. This could be an indication that, while multisectoral integration may be more common in practice, little research is being done or reported in this area formally. There is an urgent need for further research into integrated multi-sectoral interventions. This research should aim to understand how social, cultural, and environmental contexts in different ways, and to different degrees, affect what is acceptable and feasible to deliver and how these ultimately influence the impact of integrated interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.