Evidence mapPaperPMID 39623463Full record

ReviewBiology of sex differences2024

Embracing sex-specific differences in engineered kidney models for enhanced biological understanding of kidney function.

Charlotte Veser, Aurélie Carlier, Vanessa Dubois, Silvia M Mihăilă, Sangita Swapnasrita

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biology of sex differences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Frontiers in global women's health · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Sex and Gender Dimensions in Hazard and Risk Assessment of Engineered Nanomaterials.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Nanomedicine and nanobiotechnology
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Charlotte VeserUtrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universiteitsweg 99, 3584 CG, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Aurélie CarlierMERLN Institute for Technology-Inspired Regenerative Medicine, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Vanessa DuboisBasic and Translational Endocrinology (BaTE), Department of Basic and Applied Medical Sciences, Ghent University, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
Silvia M Mihăilă *Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universiteitsweg 99, 3584 CG, Utrecht, The Netherlands. s.mihaila@uu.nl.
Sangita Swapnasrita *MERLN Institute for Technology-Inspired Regenerative Medicine, Universiteitssingel 40, 6229 ER, Maastricht, The Netherlands. s.swapnasrita@maastrichtuniversity.nl.ORCID 0000-0002-8931-5409

Funding

Nierstichting 22OK1018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In vitro models serve as indispensable tools for advancing our understanding of biological processes, elucidating disease mechanisms, and establishing screening platforms for drug discovery. Kidneys play an instrumental role in the transport and elimination of drugs and toxins. Nevertheless, despite the well-documented inter-individual variability in kidney function and the multifaceted nature of renal diseases-spanning from their origin, trigger and which segment of the kidney is affected-to presentation, progression and prognosis, few studies take into consideration the variable of sex. Notably, the inherent disparities between female and male biology warrants a more comprehensive representation within in vitro models of the kidney. The omission of sex as a fundamental biological variable carries the substantial risk of overlooking sex-specific mechanisms implicated in health and disease, along with potential differences in drug responsiveness and toxicity profiles between sexes. This review emphasizes the importance of incorporating cellular, biological and functional sex-specific features of renal activity in health and disease in in vitro models. For that, we thoroughly document renal sex-specific features and propose a strategic experimental framework to integrate sex-based differences into human kidney in vitro models by outlining critical design criteria to elucidate sex-based features at cellular and tissue levels. The goal is to enhance the accuracy of models to unravel renal mechanisms, and improve our understanding of their impact on drug efficacy and safety profiles, paving the way for a more comprehensive understanding of patient-specific treatment modalities.

Indexed as

KidneyModels, BiologicalSex CharacteristicsAnimalsFemaleHumansKidney DiseasesMaleIn vitro modelsKidney functionSex-specific differences

Identifiers

PMID39623463
PMCPMC11613810

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.