ArticleJournal of physical therapy science2024
Interventional study of the effect of trunk support provision on the body pressure and ventilation volume in the prone position in healthy young and older women.
Article in Journal of physical therapy science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
[Purpose] This study aimed to determine and compare the effects of prone trunk support on facial and chest pressures and ventilation volumes between young and older women. [Participants and Methods] This study included 12 healthy young women and 10 healthy older women. We recorded the maximum body pressures on the face and chest, tidal volume, and lung capacity in three different prone positions and compared the results between the two age groups. [Results] Trunk support provision decreased the facial pressure and increased the thoracic pressure in both groups. Facial pressure was significantly higher in older women than in younger women when trunk support was not provided. No significant change was observed in the tidal volume in both groups when trunk support was provided; however, the lung capacity decreased significantly in the younger group compared to the older group. In contrast, the chest pressure, tidal volume, and lung capacity were not correlated in either group. [Conclusion] Trunk support provision effectively reduces pressure on the face, which is associated with a high risk of pressure ulcers. Although trunk support increases pressure on the chest, it has limited effects on the respiratory movements. Thus, providing trunk support in the prone position can reduce the risk of facial pressure ulcers and facilitate medical management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.