ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2024
Association between lower geriatric nutritional risk index and low cognitive functions in United States older adults: a cross-sectional study.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- The mediating role of activities of daily living in the association between nutritional risk and cognitive function among stroke survivors: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Nutritional and immune-inflammatory scoring system for predicting outcomes in newly diagnosed diffuse large B-cell lymphoma patients.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
- Geriatric nutritional risk index predicts perioperative cardiovascular events in older patients with coronary artery disease undergoing non-cardiac surgery: a multicenter retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
- The mediating role of white matter hyperintensity in the association between malnutrition and cognitive impairment in patients with cerebral small vessel disease.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: We aimed to explore the association between the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) and the risk of low cognitive functions among older adults in the United States (US). Methods: Utilizing data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Study (NHANES) database, a cross-sectional analysis was conducted. The GNRI served as a tool for evaluating the nutritional status of participants, who were categorized into two groups based on their initial GNRI scores: those with scores >98 indicating normal nutrition, and those with scores ≤98 indicating malnutrition. Cognitive function was assessed using the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer's disease word list learning test (CERAD W-L), the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), the Animal Fluency Test (AFT), and the composite-z score which was calculated by summing the z scores of individual tests, respectively. Weighted multiple logistic regression models were used to evaluate the association between GNRI and cognitive function. Interaction and stratified analyses were conducted. Results: Among a sample of 2,925 individuals aged 60 years or older, 51.3% were women. Among these individuals, 233 were identified as malnourished. Weighted multivariate logistic regression analyses indicated that individuals with malnutrition had an increased risk of low cognitive function, as evidenced by lower CERAD W-L scores (OR:1.68, 95%CI 1.19-2.36, Conclusion: Lower GNRI level is associated with significantly low cognitive function among older adults, particularly among those who have experienced a stroke or the elderly (aged 70 years and older) population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.