ArticleCancer medicine2024
Uptake of Risk-Reducing Salpingo-Oophorectomy and Gynaecologic Surveillance Among Germline BRCA Pathogenic Variants Carriers.
Article in Cancer medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) of ovarian cancer preventive strategies for women with BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants: the role of surveillance.The European journal of health economics : HEPAC : health economics in prevention and care · 2026Article
- Barriers and interventions to improve the uptake of cancer risk management strategies in hereditary cancer syndromes: a narrative review.International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionRisk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) is recommended by international guidelines in women with BRCA1/2 germline pathogenic variants (PV) to prevent ovarian cancer. Despite the solid recommendation, women frequently refuse surgery and uptake rates reported in the literature are diverse. This study analyses the uptake rate of RRSO in BRCA 1/2 PV-carriers referred to a specialised referral centre for first counselling and investigate personal factors linked to the decision.
methodsThis is a single-centre prospective study of BRCA1/2 PV-carriers referred for the first counselling to IRCCS Fondazione San Gerardo de' Tintori (Monza, Italy) between January 2010 and May 2023. Depending on individual characteristics, women were either proposed RRSO or surveillance, consisting of transvaginal ultrasound and CA125 measurement twice per year according to Regional guidelines. Women within the centre have access to a clinical psychologist, a nutritional consult and treatment of menopausal atrophy with diode vaginal laser. The primary endpoint of the study was the uptake rate of RRSO. The secondary objective was to evaluate the main reasons for refusing surgery.
resultsAmong the 287 women included, surgery was proposed to 205 women either at first counselling or during surveillance and was accepted by 197, with an uptake rate of 96.1%. 17.25% of women met the psychologist before or after surgery. The main reasons for refusing RRSO were fear of iatrogenic menopause and childbearing desire.
conclusionThis study shows a high uptake rate of RRSO in BRCA PV-carriers. We believe that the presence of a dedicated outpatient clinic with a multidisciplinary team contributes decisively to our results. Gynaecologic surveillance, as though not beneficial in terms of oncological prevention, may play a significant role in encouraging women with BRCA PV to opt for risk-reducing surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.