ArticlePancreas2025
Circulating Biomarkers of Macrophage Activation in Different Stages of Chronic Pancreatitis: A Pilot Study.
Article in Pancreas, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Advancing the Diagnosis and Treatment of Early Chronic Pancreatitis Through Innovation in Imaging and Biomarker Profiling-A Narrative Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesActivation of type M2 macrophages has been implicated in the pathogenesis of chronic pancreatitis (CP). In a clinical pilot study, we investigated blood-based markers of macrophage activation at different stages of CP. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe performed a cross-sectional analysis of prospectively collected plasma samples from healthy controls and patients with suspected or definitive CP according to the M-ANNHEIM criteria. Plasma concentrations of soluble CD163 (sCD163), soluble CD206 (sCD206), and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) were analyzed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. Group and pairwise comparisons of analytes were performed using regression models and area under the receiver operating curves (AUC-ROC).
resultsIn total, 73 subjects with CP (28 suspected CP and 45 definitive CP) and 40 controls were included. Compared to controls, the median plasma concentrations of sCD163 ( P = 0.019) and sCD206 ( P = 0.033) were elevated in patients with definitive CP. sCD206 was also elevated in patients with definitive CP ( P = 0.042) compared to suspected CP. ROC analysis revealed the optimal sCD163 cutpoint to distinguish definitive CP from controls was 1.84 mg/mL (AUC-ROC 0.65; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.54-0.77). The optimal sCD206 cutpoint to distinguish definitive CP from controls was 0.24 mg/mL (AUC-ROC 0.66; 95% CI, 0.54-0.78). MCP-1 concentrations showed no differences across subgroups.
conclusionOur study demonstrates that subjects with definitive CP, sampled during a clinically quiescent phase, exhibited increased levels of sCD163 and sCD206. This indicates the presence of activated M2 macrophages in patients with CP at advanced, but not early, clinical stages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.