Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39627164›Full record

ArticlePharmacoepidemiology and drug safety2024

Determining Targets for Antiretroviral Drug Concentrations: A Causal Framework Illustrated With Pediatric Efavirenz Data From the CHAPAS-3 Trial.

Michael Schomaker, Paolo Denti, Andrzej Bienczak, David Burger, Iván Díaz, Diana M Gibb, Ann Sarah Walker, Helen McIlleron

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Michael SchomakerDepartment of Statistics, Ludwig-Maximilians Universität München, München, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8475-0591
Paolo DentiDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.
Andrzej BienczakNovartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
David BurgerDepartment of Pharmacy, Radboud Insititute for Medical Innovation (RIMI), Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Iván DíazDivision of Biostatistics, Department of Population Health, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.
Diana M GibbMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, University College London, London, UK.
Ann Sarah WalkerMRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, University College London, London, UK.
Helen McIlleronDivision of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa.

Funding

Deutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftEuropean and Developing Countries Clinical Trials PartnershipMedical Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDetermining a therapeutic window for maintaining antiretroviral drug concentrations within an appropriate range is required for identifying effective dosing regimens. The limits of this window are typically calculated using predictive models. We propose that target concentrations should instead be calculated based on counterfactual probabilities of relevant outcomes and describe a counterfactual framework for this.

methodsThe proposed framework is applied in an analysis including longitudinal observational data from 125 HIV-positive children treated with efavirenz-based regimens within the CHAPAS-3 trial, which enrolled children < 13 years in Zambia/Uganda. A directed acyclic graph was developed to visualize the mechanisms affecting antiretroviral concentrations. Causal concentration-response curves, adjusted for measured time-varying confounding of weight and adherence, are calculated using g-computation.

resultsThe estimated curves show that higher concentrations during follow-up, 12/24 h after dose, lead to lower probabilities of viral failure (> 100 c/mL) at 96 weeks of follow-up. Estimated counterfactual failure probabilities under the current target range of 1-4 mg/L range from 24% to about 2%. The curves are almost identical for slow, intermediate and extensive metabolizers and show that a mid-dose concentration level of ≥ 3.5 mg/L would be required to achieve a failure probability of < 5%.

conclusionsOur analyses demonstrate that a causal approach may lead to different minimum concentration limits than analyses that are based on purely predictive models. Moreover, the approach highlights that indirect causes of failure, such as patients' metabolizing status, may predict patients' failure risk, but do not alter the threshold at which antiviral activity of efavirenz is severely reduced.

Indexed as

AlkynesAnti-HIV AgentsBenzoxazinesCyclopropanesDose-Response Relationship, DrugHIV InfectionsAdolescentChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantLongitudinal StudiesMaleViral LoadZambiaAlkynesAnti-HIV AgentsBenzoxazinesCyclopropanesefavirenzantiretroviral therapycausal inferencecontinuous interventionspediatricstarget concentrations

Identifiers

PMID39627164
PMCPMC11614751

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.