ArticleNature communications2024
Detecting global and local hierarchical structures in cell-cell communication using CrossChat.
Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Integrative cross-sample alignment and spatially differential gene analysis for spatial transcriptomics.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Identifying potential ligand-receptor interactions by integrating LSTM network and the attention mechanism for cell-cell communication prediction.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Spatiotemporal decoding of skin biology: development, aging, disease, and regeneration.Burns & trauma · 2026Article
- OrgaCCC: Orthogonal graph autoencoders for constructing cell-cell communication networks on spatial transcriptomics data.PLoS computational biology · 2025Article
- STAT Signature Dish: Serving Immunity with a Side of Dietary Control.Biomolecules · 2025Review
- Detecting global and local hierarchical structures in cell-cell communication using CrossChat.Nature communications · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cell-cell communication (CCC) occurs across different biological scales, ranging from interactions between large groups of cells to interactions between individual cells, forming a hierarchical structure. Globally, CCC may exist between clusters or only subgroups of a cluster with varying size, while locally, a group of cells as sender or receiver may exhibit distinct signaling properties. Current existing methods infer CCC from single-cell RNA-seq or Spatial Transcriptomics only between predefined cell groups, neglecting the existing hierarchical structure within CCC that are determined by signaling molecules, in particular, ligands and receptors. Here, we develop CrossChat, a novel computational framework designed to infer and analyze the hierarchical cell-cell communication structures using two complementary approaches: a global hierarchical structure using a multi-resolution clustering method, and multiple local hierarchical structures using a tree detection method. This framework provides a comprehensive approach to understand the hierarchical relationships within CCC that govern complex tissue functions. By applying our method to two nonspatial scRNA-seq datasets sampled from COVID-19 patients and mouse embryonic skin, and two spatial transcriptomics datasets generated from Stereo-seq of mouse embryo and 10x Visium of mouse wounded skin, we showcase CrossChat's functionalities for analyzing both global and local hierarchical structures within cell-cell communication.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.