Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39627375›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Cancer2025

Re-envisioning genetic predisposition to childhood and adolescent cancers.

Christian P Kratz

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. [Genetic diagnostics].Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Christian P KratzDepartment of Paediatric Haematology and Oncology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany. kratz.christian@mh-hannover.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4120-5873

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although cancer is rare in children and adolescents, it remains a leading cause of death within this age range, and genetic predisposition is the main known risk factor. Since the discovery of retinoblastoma-predisposing RB1 pathogenic germline variants in 1985, several additional high-penetrance cancer predisposition genes (CPGs) have been identified. Although few clinically recognizable genetic conditions display moderate cancer phenotypes, burden testing has revealed low-to-moderate penetrance CPGs. In addition to germline pathogenic variants in CPGs, postzygotic somatic mosaic CPG pathogenic variants acquired during embryonic development are increasingly recognized as factors that predispose children and adolescents to malignancies. Genome-wide association studies of various childhood and adolescent cancer types have identified some common low-risk cancer susceptibility alleles. Although the clinical utility of polygenic risk scores is currently limited in children and adolescents, polygenic risk scores developed for adults can predict subsequent cancer risks in childhood and adolescent cancer survivors. In this Review, I describe our current knowledge of genetic predisposition to childhood and adolescent cancers. Survival rates in children and adolescents with cancer and CPGs are often poor, necessitating better integration of genomic testing into clinical care to improve cancer prevention, surveillance and therapies.

Indexed as

Genetic Predisposition to DiseaseNeoplasmsAdolescentChildGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID39627375

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.